JD Admissions FAQs

There is no particular major or curriculum that is required for admission to or success in law school, and we find that a student body with backgrounds in a variety of disciplines adds depth and breadth to the classroom dialogue. As a result, an entering class at Michigan Law typically includes 65 or 70 different majors. The majors perennially most common in our entering classes are political science, history, economics, English, psychology, and philosophy; some atypical majors that we think provide particularly good training for law school are computer science, mathematics, engineering, and hard sciences, which make up about one-fifth of the class. Classics, seen relatively rarely, is also an excellent foundation for legal study. But pursuing a particular major simply because you think it will give you an advantage in the law school admissions process is an exercise in futility, since you are less likely to perform well in a major that doesn’t engage you—and because almost all areas of study have some benefit in combination with the law. We recommend, therefore, that you study subjects that are interesting to you. We also recommend that you take challenging courses in whatever is your chosen core field, and that you branch out and test yourself in areas outside your comfort zone. Classes that give you experience with close reading of texts, detailed analysis, logical reasoning, and extensive writing are always helpful.

We accept students from a wide variety of undergraduate schools, with almost 300 distinct institutions represented in the student body—and every year, we see 10 or so schools represented in the entering class that are brand-new to us!  While the strength of an undergraduate institution is certainly a factor we consider in the admissions process, our commitment to maintaining the excellence of our student body does not limit the wide range of educational institutions from which our students hail. There most assuredly is no accredited school whose graduates we would be unwilling to admit. (And for the record, contrary to popular belief/persistent and intractable rumor, students who attended the University of Michigan for their undergraduate studies are not at any disadvantage over students from other schools. Go Blue!)

As with majors, we have no preconceived list of “best” extracurriculars. You should pursue the areas that interest you. So, while as a general matter we like to see some evidence of involvement and engagement in something outside your studies, we have no particular preference for the type of activity (and it certainly doesn’t have to be law-related). It is helpful if your résumé gives us some sense of the nature and extent of your involvement; further, if the name of a group or organization is a little mysterious to the uninitiated (e.g., the whacky-sounding Kalamazoo Moustache Society, which actually raises money to combat domestic violence), it is helpful to describe briefly the mission or purpose.

It certainly isn’t necessary to take time off before law school, but if you have any hesitation about going straight through from undergrad, then you should follow that instinct—law school will always be an option, whether you decide to apply now or years in the future. Typically, about 75% of our student body has taken at least one year after undergrad to pursue work or other studies before starting law school. Taking time off can give you the opportunity to build a professional identity, explore something outside of the law, or confirm that law is the right career path for you. And when you’re preparing your résumé for applying, please keep this in mind: If your employer does work outside of the legal field or isn’t featured regularly in news headlines, it is very helpful to give us a brief explanation of the type of work your employer does. 

No. We have a great deal of confidence in both the security and quality of the LSAT, so we require a valid LSAT score for admission to our JD program and do not consider scores from other tests instead of or alongside LSAT scores. The only exception to our LSAT requirement is for current University of Michigan students who are applying to the JD program for a dual degree. In this specific case only, we will accept other graduate standardized test scores. 

With LSAC now offering test administrations eight times a year, you have lots of good options. It’s helpful to take the test early enough so that if something goes horribly wrong, you will have enough time to take it again prior to the admission season really heating up—that means that taking the test by November of the admissions season in which you are applying is the safest possible choice. The January exam may place you at a bit of a disadvantage if you want to begin law school in the same year, because the score will not be released until about the time of our application deadline. 

LSAC will produce score reports as old as June five years prior to the admission season. So, for the 2025-26 season, a score from June 2020 is the oldest we can accept.

The LSAC report for an applicant who has sat for the LSAT more than once will show every score or cancellation, as well as the average score. The ABA requires law schools to report score information based on an admitted student’s highest score, and therefore, that is the score to which we give the most weight. We do, however, consider the average score as well, because data provided by the Law School Admissions Council suggests that it has the greatest predictive utility. The average score becomes less useful, though, as the disparity between two scores increases; for that reason, if you have a significant disparity between scores (six or more points), it would be very helpful to address any explanation for the difference in an optional essay or addendum. Finally, sitting for the test three or more times tends to raise questions in the minds of the reviewers; for that reason, we suggest including an explanation of the underlying circumstances. 

While one canceled score will not raise any red flags in an application evaluation, a pattern of canceled scores may cause some concern. (For one thing, it shows that you have been exposed to the test on multiple dates, which we would expect would give you some advantage, so that subsequent score needs to be assessed with that in mind.) Depending on the circumstances, an explanation for your cancellation(s) can be helpful.

We, like most law school admissions offices, operate on a rolling basis, meaning that application files are reviewed in the order of their completion (although we don’t necessarily reach a decision on an application in the order in which it is read; some decisions simply take longer than others). This means that there is some advantage to applying earlier in the process (when more seats remain to be filled) rather than later. It is also true, though, that it is to your advantage to have the highest possible score on the LSAT—so you shouldn’t take the test until you’re ready for it. Applicants will need to take these competing considerations (application timing versus getting the optimal score) into account for themselves. Consider, though, that you can always reapply in a future year and overcome the disadvantage of a late application, but you cannot erase a low LSAT score.

Consider whether the potential benefits outweigh the costs (in both time and money) of retaking. If your score was significantly different from your practice tests (and you are confident that you were accurately timing yourself), and if you can identify something in particular that might have negatively affected your score the first time (e.g., you didn’t prepare; you were sick; there was a marching band outside the exam site), you should seriously consider retaking the test. In the absence of both of those factors, though, odds are that a second score will not be a substantial improvement; the vast majority of people who retake the LSAT get a score that is only a couple of points higher—or even a couple of points lower. It would probably make more sense for you to put your energy into making sure the other elements of your application are the best that they can be. Some matters to take into account when considering taking the test again: There is no statistically significant difference within plus or minus three points of any particular LSAT score, so a reviewer is unlikely to view small differences as important; although we give the most weight to the highest score, we also consider the average score (see also our discussion above, about how we treat multiple scores); and, most horrifyingly, there is always the possibility that you will receive a lower score on a subsequent test—a possibility that, statistically speaking, becomes more likely when the initial score is 165 or higher. Further, even if you obtain a higher score, retaking after you have already submitted your application may not improve your chances of admission (particularly if your retake exam is scheduled for February or later) because we use a rolling admissions process. 

Take yes for an answer; or, you had me at 97%

We do not typically hold applications while we await an applicant’s new LSAT score. If you want to ensure that we do not make a decision on your application until after we receive a new LSAT score, then you should wait to apply until about a week before your new score will be released. 

But if you have decided to retake the LSAT after already having submitted your application, please email us at [email protected] to let us know a new score is en route, and we will add this information to your application file. If we feel that a new score could be a decision-making difference, we will set the application aside and re-review it once the new score arrives. On the other hand, if we are comfortable admitting you without seeing the new score, we will go ahead and do that; by the same token, if we think that an increased LSAT score would not alone lead to a positive outcome, we will issue a final decision before receiving the score. If that happens, you are welcome to request that we reconsider your application in light of new information. 

If you think you may be entitled to accommodation on the LSAT, whether extra time for a learning disability or some adaptation for a physical disability, you should certainly apply to the Law School Admissions Council; instructions and a detailed FAQ are available on the LSAC website. Please be aware that the accommodation process can be time-intensive, and it would be to your benefit to apply for accommodation well in advance of when you intend to sit for the test.

If you apply for accommodation but LSAC does not grant it, we would encourage you to provide us with any information that you think would allow us to more accurately gauge your score. Likewise, we encourage you to provide us with any information about your disability that you think is relevant to an evaluation of your academic background, work history, or any other element of your admissions materials.

Request Information

Experience 100+ Publication

Email Us

You should apply electronically via the LSAC FlexApp. As you complete the FlexApp, it can be useful to refer to our annotated screenshots of the FlexApp questions, where we provide guidance on the information we are hoping to elicit. 

Annotated Application (pdf)

We need a completed application (that is, the filled-out FlexApp together with a résumé), the LSAC report (with transcripts from all colleges and universities you have attended, LSAT scores, and recommendation(s) if using LSAC’s Recommender Service), personal statement, optional essays (if any), recommendation(s) (if sending directly to us rather than via LSAC), and application fee ($75) or fee waiver. Note: one recommendation is required, but four are allowed and three are suggested. If there is any information in your application you wish to clarify—for example, your undergraduate record or gaps in employment—you may submit that information in the “Attachments” section under “Addendum.” You may submit as many addenda as you need.

We offer several types of application fee waivers. First, we give application fee waivers through LSAC’s Candidate Referral Service (CRS). These fee waivers are sent to highly qualified applicants who have registered for CRS, and will appear automatically in the application checkout on LSAC. (We send letters and emails to recipients to make them aware they’ve been selected.) 

We also waive the application fees of candidates who meet any of the bulleted criteria below: 

• U.S. military members and veterans
• Corps members and alumni of City Year, AmeriCorps, and Teach for America
• Applicants who demonstrate financial need (including any candidates who receive a need-based LSAC Fee Waiver) 

If you meet any of the criteria listed above, please complete our online fee waiver application to verify your status and request a fee waiver. 

We do not offer waivers for LSAC CAS report fees.

Fee Waiver Application

International transcripts for postsecondary work outside the United States (including its territories) or Canada should be submitted through the LSAC Credential Assembly Service. For international undergraduate work, a Foreign Credential Evaluation will be compiled by the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers, which will be incorporated into your CAS report. To get started, log in to your online account and follow the instructions for registering for the service. Be sure to print out a Transcript Request form for each institution and send it promptly to them. Questions about the Credential Assembly Service can be directed to LSAC at 215.968.1001 or LSACinfo@LSAC.org.

Be aware that there can be significant delays in processing international transcript requests.

If you completed international work through a study abroad, consortium, or exchange program sponsored by a U.S. or Canadian institution, and the work is clearly indicated as such on your home campus transcript, then you do not need to provide copies of the international transcript.

We begin accepting applications for first-year admissions by September 1, and we begin making decisions around early November. Our Early Decision deadline is November 15, and all application components—including letters of recommendation and the LSAC report—must be received by the Admissions Office by that date. (One exception: In some years, scores from the October LSAT sitting do not arrive until after November 15—so long as you have submitted everything else, the LSAT timing will not be a problem.) Our regular decision deadline is February 28.

Our rolling admissions process (in which applications are reviewed as they are completed and decisions are made on a continuous basis) means that there is some advantage to applying earlier in the season rather than later.  But—we find that in general applicants tend to overestimate the extent of this advantage! You should certainly not rush to apply in order to meet a self-imposed deadline; timing is just one small factor in the process, and you are far, far better off making sure your application materials are as strong as you can make them rather than submitting your application before you are truly comfortable. Further, there is absolutely, positively no advantage to applying in the beginning of September as opposed to the end of October, given that we don’t even begin making offers until November. In fact, we historically have found that a larger percentage of the people to whom we make offers applied in November or December rather than in September or October! Finally, while there is a bit of an advantage to applying before the New Year, even in that case, about 20% of our admitted students apply after that. So—take a breath, and apply when you are ready. 

Early Decision Option

Please be assured that your previous application does not place you at any disadvantage. You are on equal footing with all of the applicants in this admissions cycle. To reapply, you must submit a new application and re-register with LSAC, even if you are not retaking the LSAT, so that we can order a new Law School Report for you. If you completed any additional coursework since your previous application, new transcripts should be sent to LSAC. You must submit all required materials (that is, essays, resume, any addenda) with your new application even if the content has not changed, but if there is something in your previous application that you’d like us to pay particular attention to, please note that in an addendum to your application. 

Reapplication Tips  

Application Review 

The personal statement is your chance to give a brief monologue to the file readers, so the best judgment about a topic is necessarily yours—only you can know what is most relevant about your background for purposes of admission to law school. To quote our application, “There is no formula for a successful personal statement, and different individuals will find different topics to be well-suited to them.” Spend some time thinking about what it is that you would tell an admissions officer if you had ten minutes of undivided attention—perhaps about what led you to law school, about unusual challenges you’ve overcome, about your religious, political, cultural, or sexual identity, about unusual experiences or travel, or simply why you’d be an interesting person to have in the class. Whatever topic you choose, your statement will be evaluated on both content and construction, so your goal should be to write about something interesting and write about it well.

And while it is certainly not necessary to have an explicit statement about “… and this is why I want to go to law school,” you should nonetheless bear in mind that since getting admitted to law school is the goal, that question is one you should implicitly address. We also offer 10 optional essay topics, from which you can choose to write up to two additional essays, in order that our decision will be based on as much information about you as possible. These essays are truly optional, and many people are admitted without submitting additional essays beyond the personal statement; at the same time, we often find that they add extremely helpful depth and perspective.

Personal Statement 

The 99%

Optional Essays 

During the admissions stage, the only people to see applications are members of the Admissions Office, all of whom understand the importance of and are accustomed to keeping the contents of the files confidential. Unless you check the box of our application asking us not to, however, we will often pass on to particular student groups the names and contact information of admitted applicants who have self-identified as being potential members of those groups. Admitted applicants who self-identify as African American, therefore, may be contacted by the Black Law Students Association, admitted women applicants may be contacted by the Women Law Students Association, and so on. 

If you are admitted and you matriculate, your application file will be transferred to the Office of Student Records. The privacy of current students, however, is protected under federal law by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g.

We require only one letter of recommendation for your application to be considered complete, but we suggest that you submit up to three. (In general, we find that submitting more than three tends to result in unhelpful repetition of information—but that said, of course, additional letters may make sense in an individual case.) For most applicants, an academic recommendation is the most useful. It can be from an undergraduate or a graduate institution, and it need not be from a professor. The best advice is to select recommenders who know you the best and can speak in the most detail about your potential contribution, and for many candidates, that recommender will be a teaching assistant or graduate student instructor. We also find it very useful to hear from employers or others who have supervised your work (whether in a volunteer or for-pay capacity). For some candidates, a helpful recommender might be more idiosyncratic, such as a coach. Recommendations we usually find unhelpful are those from people who have themselves attained impressive accomplishments but who have little detailed knowledge of the candidate, and those from relatives, who may know the candidate quite intimately but to whom we naturally attribute a certain bias.

Letters of Recommendation 

Snagging that perfect letter of recommendation

We know this feeling all too well; admissions officers are human, too, and we understand that even the most eagle-eyed proofreaders can miss a typo or two. Please rest assured that small errors will not dash your chance of admission, and chances are that you can leave it alone; our reviewers will simply brush off the error—or they might not even notice it!

However, if you believe the error is truly glaring or if you’d like peace of mind, you can email an addendum to [email protected] to identify the error you’d like to correct. Please be aware that we cannot substitute or remove materials that have already been submitted; we can only supplement.

We always appreciate when our applicants keep in touch throughout the cycle! The method for updating depends on what’s new. Some updates are automatic: LSAC automatically sends us our applicants’ new LSAT scores and updated transcripts (as long as you’ve sent your most recent transcript to them). Other updates, such as new essays or addenda, should be emailed to us directly. If you would like to update something that you’ve already submitted—a corrected essay or résumé for example—you should also email us directly, describing the changes in the body of the email and highlighting the changes in the attached document. (Please note that we can’t replace or substitute with new material; we can only supplement.) Finally, new letters of recommendation can be either submitted through LSAC’s service or emailed to us directly from the recommender. 

If you mark “yes” for in-state tuition on your application and we send you an email telling you that you have to apply for it, it doesn’t mean the Admissions Office thinks you’re not eligible. All it means is that something in your record has triggered, under preset criteria, a need for you to apply. We understand this can be frustrating for people who have no doubt that they qualify, but the In-State Tuition Guidelines are complex and comprehensive, and in order to ensure that they are fairly implemented, review of additional information by the experts in the Residency Classification Office is required in many cases—perhaps because you have been employed outside the state, or because you attended a college outside the state, or for one of many other possible reasons.

The guidelines and application can be found on the Office of Registrar site, or you’re welcome to contact the Residency Classification Office with your questions, in person or by mail at LSA Suite 5000, 500 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1382, by email at [email protected], or by telephone at 734.764.1400. The office is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekdays, and accepts calls Monday through Thursday, 8 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.

Be assured that your JD application will not be held or delayed during the residency classification process. While you should apply for in-state tuition as soon as you can, we do not wait for the official determination to review your JD application; we just give you the benefit of the doubt.

We typically receive about 6000 applications for a target entering class of 300-320.

Because we receive so many highly competitive applications and base our decisions on a wide variety of factors, it is impossible to judge an individual applicant’s chances of admission based simply on the metrics. Even if we have all of the relevant information for an applicant, admissions decisions are made within the context of the entire applicant pool—and we typically receive about 6000 applications for a target class of 300-320. That said, the median LSAT score for the 2025 entering class was 171 and the 25th and 75th percentiles for the class were 168 and 173, respectively. The median GPA was 3.88 with the 25th and 75th percentiles at 3.74 and 3.95, respectively. 

Medians and “Preventive”

We send invitations to apply only to those people who, through the information they provide to LSAC’s Candidate Referral Service, seem like they would be competitive applicants. However, the information we have available to us through the Candidate Referral Service is limited: LSAT, GPA, major, undergraduate institution, and so forth. An invitation to apply cannot be a guarantee of admission because, as described above, we take many other factors into account that are not reflected in the summary data provided by CRS. Historically, however, receiving an invitation does indicate a somewhat greater likelihood of admission.

Bear in mind that it’s very difficult, for you or for us, to estimate your chances of admission (and that, as they say in the stock market, past performance is not a guarantee of future results). Typically, more than half of our applicant pool has numbers that are at or above our median scores for the previous year’s incoming class, which is almost three times the number of people we can actually admit. Consider, too, that “the numbers” are merely a starting point for our evaluation of which candidates will make up the best possible entering class. If you want to increase your chances of admission, please take care with your application, and be sure to provide us with all the relevant information you can about your experiences, activities, and background and how you might be a good fit for our community.

Doing my bit for the country

We have a binding Early Decision program; by applying to it, you agree to come if we make you an offer. For a fuller discussion, complete with deadlines, please click on the button below.

Early Decision Option

Applying Early Decision

We often get semi-frantic emails and calls from people who are concerned that their applications are not complete, or that their failure already to have received a decision spells certain doom. In an effort to allay some of these fears, we provide this detailed guide to what goes on in the Admissions Office once we receive your application materials, and what you can expect in terms of timing.

First, when we receive the initial application materials from you, we immediately send you an email letting you know we’ve received them. This email does not mean that the application is complete, but it also doesn’t mean it’s not complete. It simply means we’ve received your initial materials. We then begin processing your application, which involves checking our files to see whether we have already received some submission from you or from your recommenders in advance of the actual application, retrieving your CAS report, performing considerable and time-consuming data entry,  and preparing comment sheets for the readers. This takes a fair amount of time for each applicant, and it is not unusual for us to receive 150-200 applications a day, particularly in December and January.

You will receive an email from our office about a week after we receive your application, with your University of Michigan ID and a link to our Applicant Portal, through which you can check the status of your application. Once we have received and processed all your materials, we mark your application as complete, and our Online Status Check registers the status change. Those applications are parceled out for a first read, and then a second read. An application might receive a decision immediately or may proceed to further review. We are cautious in our decisions, either to admit or to deny, and do not like to proceed hastily. While we’re sensitive to the stress law school applicants are under, we take our responsibility of composing a top-notch class extremely seriously, and that is to your benefit; you can be assured your application materials are receiving a thorough review.

As a general proposition, we make roughly 40 offers most weeks between November and February. We aggregate denial and waitlist decisions and then begin sending weekly in January for denials, and in February for waitlist invitations. We delay sending those decisions until we have had the chance to review a significant portion of our applications. 

Applicant Portal

(For use by those who have already submitted applications)

We view our student body as one of our greatest assets, and our goal is to admit a group of students who, individually and collectively, are among the best applying to American law schools in a given year. We seek a mix of students with varying backgrounds and experiences, who will respect and learn from each other. Our most general measures are an applicant’s LSAT score and undergraduate GPA, and, as measured by those statistics, Michigan is among the handful of the most selective law schools in the country. However, each of these measures is far from definitive. Even the highest possible scores will not guarantee admission, and quite low scores will, likewise, not automatically result in a denial, as both circumstances may have significant offsetting considerations. We evaluate the strength of the personal statement and recommendations, the rigor of an applicant’s undergraduate curriculum, significant work and life experiences, and community involvement, among other factors. 

Michigan Law’s Admissions Policy

While being the relative of a Law School graduate—aka being a “legacy”— does not create a preference in our admissions process, we do find that context useful in understanding an applicant’s interest in the Law School. The Law School may also, on occasion, use that information in order to communicate with a given alumnus/ae after an admissions decision is made.

Legacy Admissions

While Michigan residency is a factor in admissions, it plays only a small part in our decision-making process. We are a public institution, but we are also highly selective. We are fortunate enough to receive so many highly qualified applicants from Michigan that our incoming classes are composed of about 20 percent in-state residents. Our office makes only preliminary determinations of residency based on the answers that you provide in your application and the guidelines given by the University; if you have detailed questions about residency guidelines, please contact the University of Michigan’s Residency Classification Office at 734.764.1400 or [email protected]. 

While evaluative interviews are not a part of our process, our admissions counselors are happy to meet with you and answer any questions you may have about the Law School or the admissions process. We also occasionally contact applicants to get clarification about certain elements of an application. We choose not to interview because social science research suggests that interviews offer no information helpful to the decision-making process; further, anecdotal evidence suggests that many fantastic and talented people do not always make a great first impression, particularly if the meeting takes place under the stressful circumstances of an evaluative interview. Interviews also present opportunities for discrimination on the basis of academically irrelevant personal characteristics, which we would prefer to avoid. And, to tell the truth: Dean Zearfoss is a bit of a control freak and doesn’t like the idea of delegating the interviews.

It is worth noting that schools that do employ interviews typically do so not because it enhances their selection of candidates, but because it enhances their ability to select people who are committed to attending the institution. In other words, they believe that if you are willing to attend an interview, you are much more likely to attend the school if you are admitted.

You went to great lengths to apply early in our season, and now you’re disappointed—or, well, irritated—that you haven’t received an answer yet. We understand how you feel, but we nonetheless ask for your patience. Once the Applicant Portal shows that your application is complete, your application is reviewed within a week by a first reader, and is then sent on to a second reader—but even after getting two people’s input, we can’t always make a decision right away. Simply put, some decisions are more difficult than others. A delay doesn’t mean we’ve forgotten about you; it just means we have a lot of applications to read and decisions to make. We routinely and frequently review the files of applicants for whom we couldn’t make an immediate decision, in an effort to balance our sensitivity to your stress levels—which, honestly, we are very conscious of!—with our mission of making the best possible decisions.

Chill lemur speaks

Such questions deeply underestimate the confidence of this Admissions Office, which tends to assume that everyone who is admitted to Michigan Law will want to come to Michigan Law. Okay, okay, we know—not everyone comes, and people who are admitted to lots of other top law schools are the ones least likely to come. But if this yield-protection allegation were true, then we’ve been implementing our nefarious plans very poorly; every year, the school with which we have the highest overlap for admitted candidates is Harvard. Bottom line, we never deny someone because we think, by virtue of their LSAT and GPA, that they will be unlikely to accept our offer of admission. Like all top law schools, we simply receive far more applications from prospective students with high numbers than we could possibly admit—and we look at many, many factors apart from the numbers. No matter how strong a candidate you are numerically, it is worth putting effort into your application to ensure that you are portraying yourself as well as possible.

Yield Protection: myth or reality? Or a little of both? 

The law school accepts transfer students for the fall semester only, and applications for transfer students are accepted between May 1 and July 14. Candidates for transfer admission must have completed the equivalent of the first year of law school (at least 28 credits). They must complete the application and provide five items: 

• a complete first-year transcript;
• a statement of class rank, either indicated on the first-year transcript or a letter indicating the applicant’s class rank (unless your school does not rank);
• the first page of the applicant’s CAS report;
• a letter of good standing from the dean; and
• a letter of recommendation from a professor at their current law school. 

Transfer and Visiting Students 

If you are planning a visit to the Law School, we would be happy to help arrange a tour and individual appointment with an admissions counselor. You are also able to sit in on some specially designated classes throughout the academic year. Please refer to this page for more details about scheduling a visit:

Visit Michigan Law 

Typically, three-fourths of our student body spend one or more years working or volunteering before enrolling in the Law School; most take five or fewer years off.

The mean age of the 2025 entering class is 24.8; ages range from 20 to 44. 

Michigan Law students have numerous on-campus and off-campus housing options. Typically, a little less than half of the first-year class chooses to live on campus in the Lawyers Club, which is right next to the Law School’s academic buildings. The Lawyers Club offers furnished single rooms with private or semi-private bathrooms, and a meal plan is included in the resident fee. The Lawyers Club offers an academic-year lease, which concludes after final exams in May, and room and board charges appear on the same billing statement as tuition charges, which means that funds from merit scholarships, need-based aid, and federal student loans can be conveniently applied to cover the cost of living in the Lawyers Club.

Another on-campus option is our graduate and family housing on North Campus—called Northwood Community Apartments—which is a short, free bus ride away from the Law School. Also, Munger Graduate Residences are a unique option for graduate students from all University of Michigan programs and combines the convenience of single bedrooms and private bathrooms with an interdisciplinary program designed to foster community. 

Almost all 2Ls and 3Ls live off campus in apartments and houses, most within walking distance of the Law School. The University’s Off-Campus Housing Office has an extensive website that includes listings of apartments, rooms, co-ops, parking spaces, and a roommate matching service. It also includes maps and a list of landlords and management companies who have met certain criteria for inclusion. 

Law students also have the option of living at the Kent Inn House of Phi Delta Phi, known as the Phid House, which is very affordable and just a block from the law school. 

Housing

Our students come from all over the country and all over the world. About 20 percent come from Michigan and another 20 percent or so come from the other 11 states that compose the Midwest. A majority of our students come from the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, and West Coast.

Ann Arbor is an exciting and vibrant city of about 120,000. Because it is, in many respects, the quintessential “university town,” it offers many businesses and services geared towards students’ needs, therefore making it a great place to be a student. Yet Ann Arbor is also remarkably sophisticated, offering a plethora of cultural activities—theatre, dance, popular and classical music, films—as well as restaurants specializing in a wide variety of cuisines, innumerable coffee shops, and bookstores. And, of course, the sports venues—both college and professional—are unsurpassed. Athletes, in addition to spectators, will love what Ann Arbor can offer in terms of running, canoeing, cross-country skiing, and workout facilities. If you’re moving to Ann Arbor with family, the city has great public schools as well as parks and an award-winning public library.

Some useful websites to introduce you to Ann Arbor are:

• annarborobserver.com
• annarbor.org
• a2gov.org
• mlive.com/ann-arbor
• a2ychamber.org
• Life in Ann Arbor 

It is our impression that, perhaps due to some fundamental geographic confusion, many people imagine the weather in Ann Arbor to be much worse than it actually is. Protestations from us, however, end up sounding a bit pathetic. So instead, we say judge for yourself—check out the average temperatures and snowfall in Ann Arbor, Boston, New York and Chicago. And bear in mind: It’s always a balmy 70 degrees in the library.

We are at the western edge of the Eastern time zone, so we have the same time as our friends on the East Coast, but it is light for about an hour later in the evening—a particularly welcome fact during December afternoons.

We do expect to see essentially an equivalent level of mastery of written English. We expect to see certain types of minor mistakes—e.g., problems with plurals—with non-native speakers, but in terms of overall skill level, we expect full fluency. Applying this standard is to the benefit of the applicant, because this is the level of skill an applicant will need in order to succeed here.

We expect that essays are the work of the applicant. It’s one thing to show them to a friend or two for input, but we definitely frown upon a professional service. This is true whether the applicant is a native speaker or not; all too often, U.S. natives will hire “admissions consultants” to actually pen their personal statements, and we view that too as a violation of our expectation that all the work is that of the applicant. You’d be surprised how easily we are able to detect these professionally polished essays. We will often compare the writing style of the LSAT essay with that of the personal statement, for example, and when there’s a stark contrast, we’ll know why.

We do not require TOEFL scores for the JD application as the LSAT is an adequate measure of English proficiency.

We don’t have a formula, but it will certainly play an important role in the evaluation.

For the first scenario, we wouldn’t at all be surprised to see someone seeking a JD rather than an LLM; the two degrees have very different purposes and functions. If someone has already earned an LLM in the U.S., however, it would be useful (though not mandatory, by any means) to include a discussion of what additional value the JD will provide.

We definitely expect all our JD candidates, including those for whom English is not the native language, to be fluent in English; to that end, being able to demonstrate significant English language background will be helpful. Majoring, however, is certainly not necessary. Any level of schooling in an English-speaking country would be a helpful indicator of English preparation but again, it’s not required. Often we see students who have worked for U.S. companies or firms, albeit in another country, and that too can be a good way to indicate strong English proficiency.

It definitely won’t hurt you—we won’t attribute your professor’s relative lack of English ability to you!—but it simply won’t be a weight in your favor. If we have trouble understanding the letter, we will most likely simply ignore it. That said, it is important to have at least one strong letter of recommendation from someone who is able to communicate easily in English.

The biggest hurdle for the international applicant is often the personal statement. We really look for something personal; not something secret or scandalous, but something that only you could have written, and something that really gives us insight into what you would be like to have in the student body. U.S. culture likely trains U.S. folks to do this relatively easily, but it can be a more uncomfortable exercise for people from many other cultures.

The University of Michigan generally, and the Law School in particular, are committed to supporting undocumented and DACA students. When you are completing the FlexApp, for “U.S. Visa type, if any,” simply write “none” or “N/A.”

Undocumented applicants are eligible to apply for a fee waiver based on financial need. (For information about application fee waivers, please see the answer to “Does Michigan offer application fee waivers? If so, how can I get one?” earlier in this FAQ.) All undocumented admitted students will be considered automatically for merit-based awards and are also welcome to apply for need-based grants, regardless of whether they have been granted DACA status. In addition, applicants who meet specific criteria (such as attending school in Michigan, and graduating from a Michigan high school) may also qualify for in-state tuition through the Residency Classification Office.

For more information about other resources, refer to the University’s resources for funding for non-citizen students.