Over­stat­ing the Sat­is­fac­tion of Lawyers”

  • Legal Writ­ing and Research
Law and Social Inquiry
2014

Trib­ute: Dores McCrary McCree”

Michi­gan Jour­nal of Race & Law
2011

Start­ing Out: Chang­ing Pat­terns of First Jobs for Michi­gan Law School Graduates”

  • Legal His­to­ry
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
2009

Who We Were and Who We Are: How Michi­gan Law Stu­dents Have Changed Since the 1950s: Find­ings from 40 Years of Alum­ni Surveys”

  • Legal His­to­ry
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
2009

Peo­ple, Times, Law School Lead­er­ship Join to Launch South Africa Program”

  • Human Rights
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
2006

The Real Impact of Elim­i­nat­ing Affir­ma­tive Action in Amer­i­can Law Schools: An Empir­i­cal Cri­tique of Richard Sander’s Study”

  • Pub­lic Inter­est Law 
Stan­ford Law Review
2005

Fore­word to Legal­iz­ing Gay Marriage

  • Civ­il Rights
Legal­iz­ing Gay Marriage
2004

For Ira Ell­man: One More Reason Why Mak­ing Fam­i­ly Law Is Hard’ ”

Ariz. State Law Journal
2003

Civ­i­liz­ing the Natives: Cus­tom­ary Mar­riage in Post-Apartheid South Africa”

  • Civ­il Rights
Engag­ing Cul­tur­al Dif­fer­ences: The Mul­ti­cul­tur­al Chal­lenge in Lib­er­al Democracies
2002

Review of Divorce Lawyers at Work: Vari­eties of Pro­fes­sion­al­ism in Practice

  • Legal Ethics and Pro­fes­sion­al Responsibility
Con­tem­po­rary Sociology
2002

Myths and Facts about Affir­ma­tive Action”

Ari­zona Attorney
2001

For the Best of Friends and for Lovers of all Sorts, a Sta­tus Oth­er than Marriage”

  • Civ­il Rights
  • Pub­lic Inter­est Law 
Notre Dame Law Review
2001

What if? The Legal Con­se­quences of Mar­riage and the Legal Needs of Les­bian and Gay Male Couples”

  • Civ­il Rights
Queer Fam­i­lies, Queer Pol­i­tics: Chal­leng­ing Cul­ture and the State
2001

Michi­gan’s Minor­i­ty Grad­u­ates in Prac­tice: Answers to Method­olog­i­cal Queries”

Law and Social Inquiry
2000

Michi­gan’s Minor­i­ty Grad­u­ates in Prac­tice: The Riv­er Runs through Law School”

  • Legal Ethics and Pro­fes­sion­al Responsibility
Law and Social Inquiry
2000

Civ­i­liz­ing the Natives: Mar­riage in Post-Apartheid South Africa”

  • Inter­na­tion­al and Com­par­a­tive Law
  • Civ­il Rights
Daedalus
2000

Cou­ples: Mar­riage, Civ­il Union, and Domes­tic Partnership”

  • Civ­il Rights
Cre­at­ing Change: Sex­u­al­i­ty, Pub­lic Pol­i­cy, and Civ­il Rights
2000

Learn­ing and Serv­ing: Pro Bono Legal Ser­vices by Law Students”

Michi­gan Bar Journal
2000

The Bak­er Case, Civ­il Unions, and the Recog­ni­tion of our Com­mon Human­i­ty: An Intro­duc­tion and a Speculation”

  • Civ­il Rights
Ver­mont Law Review
2000

Fam­i­ly Law and Gay and Les­bian Fam­i­ly Issues in the Twen­ti­eth Century”

  • Civ­il Rights
Fam­i­ly Law Sym­po­sium 2000
2000

The African Amer­i­can, Lati­no, and Native Amer­i­can Grad­u­ates of One Amer­i­can Law School, 1970 – 1996

Soci­ety of Amer­i­can Law Teach­ers Equalizer
1999

Rethink­ing the Sub­stan­tive Rules for Cus­tody Dis­putes in Divorce”

  • Chil­dren and the Law
Fam­i­ly Law in Action: A Reader
1999

Fam­i­ly Law and Gay and Les­bian Fam­i­ly Issues in the Twen­ti­eth Century”

  • Civ­il Rights
Fam­i­ly Law Quarterly
1999

Les­bian Divorce: A Com­men­tary on the Legal Issues”

  • Con­sti­tu­tion­al Law
  • Civ­il Rights
Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Orthopsychiatry
1998

Mar­riage Today: Legal Con­se­quences for Same Sex and Oppo­site Sex Couples”

  • Civ­il Rights
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
1997

Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage”

  • Civ­il Rights
Hof­s­tra Law Review
1997

25 Divorce Attor­neys and 40 Clients in Two Not So Big but Not So Small Cities in Mass­a­chu­setts and Cal­i­for­nia: An Appreciation”

Law and Social Inquiry
1997

Hon­esty, Pri­va­cy, and Shame: When Gay Peo­ple Talk about Oth­er Gay Peo­ple to Non­gay People”

  • Civ­il Rights
Michi­gan Jour­nal of Gen­der and Law
1997

What If? The Legal Con­se­quences of Mar­riage and the Legal Needs of Les­bian and Gay Male Couples”

  • Civ­il Rights
Michi­gan Law Review
1996

Fathers, the Wel­fare Sys­tem, and the Virtues and Per­ils of Child-Sup­­port Enforcement”

Vir­ginia Law Review
1995

Gay Men, AIDS, and the Code of the Condom”

Har­vard Civ­il Rights-Civ­il Lib­er­ties Law Review
1994

Pub­lic Poli­cies on Chil­dren and Families”

  • Chil­dren and the Law
The Social Impact of AIDS in the Unit­ed States
1993

Tales of Two Cities: AIDS and the Legal Recog­ni­tion of Domes­tic Part­ner­ships in San Fran­cis­co and New York”

  • Civ­il Rights
  • Health Law
Law and Sexuality
1992

The Bur­dens of Edu­ca­tion­al Loans: The Impacts of Debt on Job Choice and Stan­dards of Liv­ing for Stu­dents at Nine Amer­i­can Law Schools”

Jour­nal of Legal Education
1992

Com­men­tary: Meet­ing the Finan­cial Needs of Children”

  • Chil­dren and the Law
Brook­lyn Law Review
1991

Debts, Job Choic­es, and Finan­cial Bur­den: Edu­ca­tion­al Debts at Nine Amer­i­can Law Schools

1991

Kevin E. Kennedy”

  • Legal Writ­ing and Research
Michi­gan Law Review
1990

Step­par­ents, Bio­log­ic Par­ents, and the Law’s Per­cep­tion of Fam­i­ly’ After Divorce”

  • Chil­dren and the Law
Divorce Reform at the Crossroads
1990

The First Year Cours­es: What’s There and What’s Not”

  • Legal Writ­ing and Research
Look­ing at Law School: A Stu­dent Guide from the Soci­ety of Amer­i­can Law Teachers
1990

Accom­mo­da­tion and Sat­is­fac­tion: Women and Men Lawyers and the Bal­ance of Work and Family”

Law and Social Inquiry
1989

Edu­ca­tion­al Debts and the Wors­en­ing Posi­tion of Small-Firm, Gov­ern­ment, and Legal-Ser­vices Lawyers”

Jour­nal of Legal Education
1989

The Fed­er­al Gov­ern­ment and a Pro­gram of Advance Main­te­nance’ in the Unit­ed States”

  • Admin­is­tra­tive Law
Child Sup­port: From Debt Col­lec­tion to Social Policy
1988

Wade H. McCree, Jr”

  • Legal Writ­ing and Research
Michi­gan Law Review
1987

The Abus­es of Social Sci­ence: A Response to Fine­man and Opie”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Wis­con­sin Law Review
1987

Social Pol­i­cy Exper­i­men­ta­tion: A Posi­tion Paper”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Eval­u­a­tion Stud­ies: Review Annual
1986

The Legal­iza­tion’ of the Fam­i­ly: Toward a Pol­i­cy of Sup­port­ive Neutrality”

Uni­ver­si­ty of Michi­gan Jour­nal of Law Reform
1985

Social Pol­i­cy Exper­i­men­ta­tion: A Posi­tion Paper”

Eval­u­a­tion Review
1985

Smith v. Offer: A Case Study of Chil­dren in Fos­ter Care”

  • Chil­dren and the Law
In the Inter­est of Chil­dren: Advo­ca­cy, Law Reform and Pub­lic Policy
1985

The First Year Cours­es: What’s There and What’s Not”

  • Legal Writ­ing and Research
Look­ing at Law School: A Stu­dent Guide from the Soci­ety of Amer­i­can Law Teachers
1984

Rethink­ing the Sub­stan­tive Rules for Cus­tody Dis­putes in Divorce”

  • Chil­dren and the Law
Michi­gan Law Review
1984