“The Supreme Court is poised to reverse affirmative action: Here’s what you need to know”
Brookings
2023
Daedalus
2018
“When Law Calls, Does Science Answer? A Survey of Distinguished Scientists & Engineers”
- Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018
Daedalus
2018
“Why Hillary Won’t Be Indicted and Shouldn’t Be: An Objective Legal Analysis”
- Law and Social Sciences
The American Prospect Longform
2016
“Mismatch and Science Desistance: Failed Arguments Against Affirmative Action”
UCLA Law Review Discourse
2016
“Justice Kennedy and the Fisher Revisit: Will the Irrelevant Prove Decisive?”
- Law and Social Sciences
Texas Law Review See Also
2016
“The American Jury System: A Synthetic Overview”
Chicago-Kent Law Review
2015
“The Mismatch Myth in U.S. Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Empirical Evidence at the Law School and Undergraduate Levels”
- Law and Social Sciences
Affirmative Action and Racial Equity: Considering the Fisher Case to Forge the Path Ahead
2015
Contemporary Sociology
2014
A Modern Approach to Evidence
2013
“Growing Up in Law & Society: The Pulls of Policy and Methods”
- Law and Social Sciences
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
2013
A Modern Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, Transcripts, and Cases
2011
“Reflections on Class in American Legal Education”
Denver University Law Review
2011
“A Personal Odyssey Toward a Theme: Race and Equality in the United States: 1948-2009”
Law and Society Review
2010
“Can there be a Progressive Bioethics?”
Progress in Bioethics
2010
“The Inevitability of Theory”
California Law Review
2010
“The Significance of Statistical Significance: Two Authors Restate an Incontrovertible Caution. Why a Book?”
Law and Social Inquiry
2009
“Low Probability / High Consequence Events: Dilemmas of Damage Compensation”
DePaul Law Review
2009
Science Progress
2008
“Policy Forum: Studying Eyewitness Investigations in the Field”
Law and Human Behavior
2008
“Frank Allen: An Appreciation”
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2008
“Empirical Research for Public Policy: With Examples from Family Law”
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
2008
“Anglo-American and Continental Systems: Marsupials and Mammals of the Law”
- Law and Social Sciences
Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context: Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjan Damaska
2008
“The Internationalization of Lay Legal Decision-Making: Jury Resurgence and Jury Research”
Cornell International Law Journal
2007
“Group Report: What is the Role of Heuristics in Litigation”
- Law and Social Sciences
Heuristics and the Law
2006
Evidence Stories
2006
“Citizen Participation in Jury Decision Making: Juries, Lay Judges and Japan”
The Jury System: Contemporary Research
2006
Introduction to Evidence Stories
Evidence Stories
2006
“The Real Impact of Eliminating Affirmative Action in American Law Schools: An Empirical Critique of Richard Sander’s Study”
- Public Interest Law
Stanford Law Review
2005
“The Organization of American Legal Education: Are There Any Lessons for Japan?”
Journal of Law and Politics
2004
“Amerika Gassyukoku ni okeru Hogaku Kyoiku Taisei: Nihon ni totte Kyokun ha Sonzai suruka”
Ho to Seiji
2004
“Business on Trial: The True Story”
Judicature
2002
“Following the Man on the Clapham Omnibus: Social Science Evidence in Malpractice Litigation”
Wake Forest Law Review
2002
“Which Students? Japan’s Challenge and Opportunity”
Law Quadrangle Notes
2002
“Breaking Deadlock, Shattering Ideals”
Law, Probability and Risk
2002
“Value Issues - The Public Health Response to Bioterrorism”
Findings Magazine
2002
“Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, and a Supreme Court Inspired Agenda for Jury Research (Special Issue: The Jury’s Role in Administering Justice in the United States)”
St Louis University Public Law Review
2002
“Activist Scholarship”
Law and Society Review
2001
“Myths and Facts about Affirmative Action”
Arizona Attorney
2001
“Juries: Investments in Democracy”
Law Quadrangle Notes
2001
“The Economic Analysis of Evidence Law: Common Sense on Stilts”
Virginia Law Review
2001
“Michigan’s Minority Graduates in Practice: Answers to Methodological Queries”
Law and Social Inquiry
2000
A Modern Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, Transcripts, and Cases
2000
“Michigan’s Minority Graduates in Practice: The River Runs through Law School”
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Law and Social Inquiry
2000
“Befuddled Judges: Statistical Evidence in Title VII Cases”
Legacies of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
2000
Law and Human Behavior
2000
“Linking the Visions”
Law Quadrangle Notes
2000
“Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, and a Supreme Court Inspired Agenda for Jury Research”
International Commentary on Evidence
1999
“Cultural Differences and Discrimination: Samoans before a Public Housing Eviction Board”
Race and Ethnic Relations in the United States: Readings for the 21st Century
1999