Bernsteins's Paper advances no constitutional arguments for requiring the government to ensure economic security for retarded citizens. His omission is justified not merely by the alternative focus he has chosen, but also by the absence of any sound or vendible constitutional arguments to advance. There remain, however, important roles for attorneys.
"The Right to an Adequate Income and Employment: A Reply to Professor Bernstein"
Areas of Interest
The Mentally Retarded Citizen and the Law