“Introduction”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018

“When Law Calls, Does Science Answer? A Survey of Distinguished Scientists & Engineers”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018

“Issue on Science & the Legal System”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018

“Why Hillary Won’t Be Indicted and Shouldn’t Be: An Objective Legal Analysis”

  • Law and Social Sciences
The American Prospect Longform
2016

“Justice Kennedy and the Fisher Revisit: Will the Irrelevant Prove Decisive?”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Texas Law Review See Also
2016

“The Mismatch Myth in U.S. Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Empirical Evidence at the Law School and Undergraduate Levels”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Affirmative Action and Racial Equity: Considering the Fisher Case to Forge the Path Ahead
2015

Review of Failing Law Schools by Brian Tamanaha

  • Law and Social Sciences
Contemporary Sociology
2014

“Growing Up in Law & Society: The Pulls of Policy and Methods”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
2013

“Maintaining U.S. Scientific Leadership”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Science Progress
2008

“Anglo-American and Continental Systems: Marsupials and Mammals of the Law”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context: Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjan Damaska
2008

“Group Report: What is the Role of Heuristics in Litigation”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Heuristics and the Law
2006

“Amicus Brief: Kumho Tire v. Carmichael”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Law and Human Behavior
2000

“A Classic at 25: Reflections of Galanter’s ‘Haves’ Article and Work It Has Inspired”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Law and Society Review
1999

“Dependency in the Welfare State: Beyond the Due Process Vision”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Contemporary Sociology
1991

An Invitation to Law and Social Science: Desert, Disputes, and Distribution

  • Law and Social Sciences
1990

“The Autonomy of Law: Two Visions Compared”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society
1988

“Social Science in Court: On ‘Eyewitness Experts’ and Other Issues”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Law and Human Behavior
1986

An Invitation to Law and Social Science: Desert, Disputes, and Distribution

  • Law and Social Sciences
1986

“The Twelve-Person, Unanimous Jury: Does It Have More than History to Recommend It?”

  • Law and Social Sciences
International Society of Barristers Quarterly
1986

“Law & Society: Its Research”

  • Law and Social Sciences
SyllaBus. (American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar)
1984

Review of Social Science in the Courtroom: Statistical Techniques and Research Methods for Winning Class-Action Suits

  • Law and Social Sciences
Contemporary Sociology
1984

“A Right to Every Woman’s Evidence”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Iowa Law Review
1981

Review of Law in a Changing America

  • Law and Social Sciences
American Sociological Review
1971