Fordham Law Review
2021
“Suspect Spheres, Not Enumerated Powers: A Guide for Leaving the Lamppost”
- Constitutional Law
Michigan Law Review
2021
Fordham Law Review
2020
Michigan Law Review Online
2020
“Herein of ‘Herein Granted’: Why Article I’s Vesting Clause Does Not Support the Doctrine of Enumerated Powers”
- Constitutional Law
Constitutional Commentary
2020
Green Bag
2019
“ ‘The Essential Characteristic’: Enumerated Powers and the Bank of the United States”
- Constitutional Law
Michigan Law Review
2018
Foreign Affairs
2018
Michigan Law Review Online
2018
California Law Review
2018
Cornell Law Review
2017
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law
2017
Cornell Law Review
2017
“Is Theocracy Our Politics? Thoughts on William Baude’s ‘Is Originalism Our Law?’ ”
- Constitutional Law
Columbia Law Review Sidebar
2016
Michigan Law Review
2016
Yale Law Journal
2014
University of Chicago Law Review
2013
“How the Gun-Free School Zones Act Saved the Individual Mandate”
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
2012
Michigan Law Review
2010
“The Functions of Ethical Originalism”
Texas Law Review See Also
2010
George Washington Law Review
2010
“The Future of Disparate Impact”
Michigan Law Review
2010
“Limits of Interpretivism”
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy
2009
“When Should Original Meanings Matter?”
Michigan Law Review
2008
“Double-Consciousness in Constitutional Adjudication”
Review of Constitutional Studies / Revue d’études constitutionnelles
2007
“The Riddle of Hiram Revels”
Harvard Law Review
2006
“Judicial Power and Mobilizable History”
Maryland Law Review
2006
“Bolling Alone”
Columbia Law Review
2004
“Equal Protection and Disparate Impact: Round Three”
Harvard Law Review
2003
“Canon, Anti-Canon, and Judicial Dissent”
Duke Law Journal
1998
“When Democracy is Not Self-Government: Toward a Defense of the Unanimity Rule for Criminal Juries”
Cardozo Law Review
1997
“Sins and Omissions: Slavery and the Bill of Rights”
Journal of American Constitutional History
“Memory, Resistance, and Doubt”
William and Mary Law Review