“Giving people the words to say no leads them to feel freer to say yes”
Scientific Reports
2024
“Consent searches and underestimation of compliance: Robustness to type of search, consequences of search, and demographic sample”
Journal of empirical Legal Studies
2023
“When Does Moral Engagement Risk Triggering a Hypocrisy Penalty?”
Current Opinion in Psychology
2022
“Autonomy and the Folk Concept of Valid Consent”
Cognition
2022
“Reducing Prejudice Through Law: Evidence From Experimental Psychology”
University of Chicago Law Review
2022
“Contract Schemas”
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
2021
“Using Random Assignment to Measure Court Accessibility for Low-Income Divorce Seekers”
- Legal Writing and Research
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2021
“Experimental Jurisprudence”
Science
2021
“Breaking Taboos in Fair Machine Learning: An Experimental Study”
Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization
2021
“Commonsense Consent”
Yale Law Journal
2020
“Consumer Psychology and the Problem of Fine Print Fraud”
- Law and Social Sciences
Stanford Law Review
2020
“False Signaling and Personal Moral Failings: Two Distinct Pathways to Hypocrisy with Unequal Moral Weight”
2020
“Why Do We Hate Hypocrites? Evidence for a Theory of False Signaling”
Psychological Science
2017
“Will Putting Cameras on Police Reduce Polarization?”
The Yale Law Journal
2016
“The Psychology of Punishment and the Puzzle of Why Tortfeasor Death Defeats Liability for Punitive Damages”
The Yale Law Journal
2015
“Exploring Public Attitudes towards Approaches to Discussing Costs in the Clinical Encounter”
Journal of General Internal Medicine
2014
“Affective Forecasting and Well-Being”
The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology
2013
“Forgoing Debriefing in Deceptive Research: Is It Ever Ethical?”
Ethics and Behavior
2013
“Focus Groups Highlight That Many Patients Object To Clinicians’ Focusing On Costs”
Health Affairs
2013
The Content of Consent
“Legally Magic” Words
“Commonsense Consent and Action Representation: What is ‘Essential’ to Consent?”
Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Jurisprudence