Race and Wrong­ful Con­vic­tions in the Unit­ed States 2022

The Nation­al Reg­istry of Exonerations
2022

Errors in Mis­de­meanor Adjudication”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Boston Uni­ver­si­ty Law Review
2018

The Death Penal­ty, Pub­lic Opin­ion, and Pol­i­tics in the Unit­ed States”

Saint Louis Uni­ver­si­ty Law Journal
2018

What We Think, What We Know and What We Think We Know about False Convictions”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Ohio State Jour­nal of Crim­i­nal Law
2017

Race and Wrong­ful Con­vic­tions in the Unit­ed States”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Nation­al Reg­istry of Exonerations
2017

Rate of false con­vic­tion of crim­i­nal defen­dants who are sen­tenced to death”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Pro­ceed­ings of the Nation­al Acad­e­my of Sci­ences of the Unit­ed States of America
2014

David Bal­dus and the Lega­cy of McCleskey v. Kemp”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Iowa Law Review
2012

Pre­tri­al Incen­tives, Post-Con­vic­­tion Review, and Sort­ing Crim­i­nal Pros­e­cu­tions by Guilt or Innocence”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
New York Law School Law Review
2011

Reply to Richard A. Leo and Jon B. Gould”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Ohio State Jour­nal of Crim­i­nal Law
2010

Fre­quen­cy and Pre­dic­tors of False Con­vic­tion: Why We Know So Lit­tle, and New Data on Cap­i­tal Cases”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Jour­nal of Empir­i­cal Legal Studies
2008

Con­vict­ing the Innocent”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Annu­al Review of Law and Social Science
2008

Holmes v. South Car­oli­na Upholds Tri­al by Jury”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Crim­i­nal Justice
2007

Juris­dic­tion­al Com­pe­ti­tion in Crim­i­nal Jus­tice: How Much Does It Real­ly Happen?”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review
2006

Souter Pas­sant, Scalia Ram­pant: Com­bat in the Marsh”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review First Impressions
2006

Exon­er­a­tions in the Unit­ed States 1989 Through 2003

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Jour­nal of Crim­i­nal Law and Criminology
2005

Cor­rect­ing the Past”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
2005

The Tip of the Ice­berg: Exon­er­a­tions in the Unit­ed States 1989 Through 2003

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
2004

Review for Error”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Law, Prob­a­bil­i­ty and Risk
2003

Expert Infor­ma­tion and Expert Evi­dence: A Pre­lim­i­nary Taxonomy”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Seton Hall Law Review
2003

What They Say at the End: Cap­i­tal Vic­tims’ Fam­i­lies and the Press”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Cor­nell Law Review
2003

Road Work: Racial Pro­fil­ing and Drug Inter­dic­tion on the Highway”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review
2002

Racial Pro­fil­ing under Attack”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Colum­bia Law Review
2002

Detec­tion of Decep­tion: The Case of Hand­writ­ing Expertise”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Vir­ginia Law Review
2001

Race, Peremp­to­ries, and Cap­i­tal Jury Deliberations”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Uni­ver­si­ty of Penn­syl­va­nia Jour­nal of Con­sti­tu­tion­al Law
2001

Still Unfair, Still Arbi­trary — But Do We Care?”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Ohio North­ern Uni­ver­si­ty Law Review
2000

Liv­ing with the Death Penalty”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
1999

Lost Lives: Mis­car­riages of Jus­tice in Cap­i­tal Cases”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
1999

Update: Amer­i­can Pub­lic Opin­ion on the Death Penal­ty — It’s Get­ting Personal”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Cor­nell Law Review
1998

Make-Believe: The Rules Exclud­ing Evi­dence of Char­ac­ter and Lia­bil­i­ty Insurance”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Hast­ings Law Journal
1998

Lost Lives: Mis­car­riages of Jus­tice in Cap­i­tal Cases”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Law and Con­tem­po­rary Problems
1998

We Could Pass a Law…What Might Hap­pen if Con­tin­gent Legal Fees Were Banned”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
DePaul Law Review
1998

Law in the Back­wa­ters: A Com­ment of Mir­jan Damaška’s Evi­dence Law Adrift”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Hast­ings Law Journal
1998

Going to Tri­al: A Rare Throw of the Die”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
1997

Why Civ­il Cas­es Go to Tri­al: Strate­gic Bar­gain­ing and the Desire for Vindication”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Dis­pute Res­o­lu­tion Magazine
1997

Crime, Pol­i­tics, and Race”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Har­vard Jour­nal of Law and Pub­lic Policy
1997

The Risks of Death: Why Erro­neous Con­vic­tions are Com­mon in Cap­i­tal Cases”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Buf­fa­lo Law Review
1996

Don’t Try: Civ­il Jury Ver­dicts in a Sys­tem Geared to Settlement”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
UCLA Law Review
1996

Reply to Daniel Polsby”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Buf­fa­lo Law Review
1996

The Romance of Revenge: An Alter­na­tive His­to­ry of Jef­frey Dah­mer’s Trial”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
1995

Hard­en­ing of the Atti­tudes: Amer­i­cans’ Views on the Death Penalty”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Jour­nal of Social Issues
1994

The Romance of Revenge: Cap­i­tal Pun­ish­ment in America”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Stud­ies in Law, Pol­i­tics and Society
1993

Get­ting to No’: A Study of Set­tle­ment Nego­ti­a­tions and the Selec­tion of Cas­es for Trial”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Defense Law Journal
1992

Set­tling for a Judge: A Com­ment on Cler­mont and Eisenberg”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Cor­nell Law Review
1992

Expert Evi­dence”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Wis­con­sin Law Review
1991

Get­ting to No: A Study of Set­tle­ment Nego­ti­a­tions and the Selec­tion of Cas­es for Trial”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review
1991

Clin­i­cal Real­ism: Sim­u­lat­ed Hear­ings Based on Actu­al Events in Stu­dents’ Lives”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Jour­nal of Legal Education
1990

Loss of Inno­cence: Eye­wit­ness Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion and Proof of Guilt”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Jour­nal of Legal Studies
1987

The Amer­i­can Advan­tage: The Val­ue of Inef­fi­cient Litigation”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review
1987

Over­ruled: Jury Neu­tral­i­ty in Cap­i­tal Cases”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Stan­ford Lawyer
1986

Race and Death: The Judi­cial Eval­u­a­tion of Evi­dence of Dis­crim­i­na­tion in Cap­i­tal Sentencing”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia Davis Law Review
1985