“Crawford at 20: An Introduction to the Symposium”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2024
“A Proposal to Replace the Hearsay Rules”
Richard D. Friedman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2024
“Justices May Clarify Expert Witness Confrontation Confusion”
Richard D. Friedman- Constitutional Law
Law360
2023
“Alston and the Dejudicialization of Antitrust”
Richard D. Friedman
Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law
2021
“Just Say No to the Cheap Double Play”
Richard D. Friedman
Florida International University Law Review
2019
“The Persistence of the Probabilistic Perspective”
Richard D. Friedman- Litigation
Seton Hall Law Review
2018
Seton Hall Law Review
2018
“Cardozo on the Supreme Court: Meeting High Expectations”
Richard D. Friedman- Legal History
Touro Law Review
2018
“Rescued from the Grave and Then Covered with Mud: Justice Scalia and the Unfinished Restoration of the Confrontation Right”
Richard D. Friedman- Constitutional Law
Minnesota Law Review Headnotes
2016
“Jack Weinstein and the Missing Pieces of the Hearsay Puzzle”
Richard D. Friedman- Litigation
DePaul Law Review
2015
“The Child Quasi-Witness”
Richard D. Friedman- Criminal Law
- Children and the Law
Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law
2015
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
2014
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
2014
Florida Law Review
2014
Journal of Law and Politics
2012
“Who Said the Crawford Revolution Would Be Easy?”
Richard D. Friedman- Criminal Law
Criminal Justice
2012
“Confrontation and Forensic Laboratory Reports, Round Four”
Richard D. Friedman- Litigation
Texas Tech. Law Review
2012
“Potential Responses to the Melendez-Diaz Line of Cases”
Richard D. Friedman- Criminal Law
- Constitutional Law
Criminal Law Reporter
2011
“Who Must Testify to the Results of a Forensic Laboratory Test? Bullcoming v. New Mexico”
Richard D. Friedman- Criminal Law
Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases
2011
“Craig Callen: Tributes from the Evidence Community”
Richard D. Friedman- Litigation
Michigan State Law Review
2011
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
2010
“Giles v. California: A Personal Reflection”
Richard D. Friedman
Lewis and Clark Law Review
2009
“Does an Accused Forfeit the Confrontation Right by Murdering a Witness, Absent a Purpose to Render Her Unavailable?”
Richard D. Friedman
Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases
2008
“Is a Forensic Laboratory Report Identifying a Substance as a Narcotic ‘Testimonial’ ”
Richard D. Friedman
Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases
2008
“Branch Rickey, ’11: Much More than Pioneering Baseball Leader”
Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
2007
“Crawford, Davis, and Way Beyond”
Richard D. Friedman
Journal of Law and Policy
2007
“ ‘We Really (For the Most Part) Mean It!’ ”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
2006
“Crawford Surprises: Mostly Unpleasant”
Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Justice
2005
“Grappling with the Meaning of ‘Testimonial’ ”
Richard D. Friedman
Brooklyn Law Review
2005
“Confrontation after Crawford”
Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
2005
“Adjusting to Crawford: High Court Decision Restores Confrontation Clause Protection”
Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Justice
2004
“The Confrontation Clause Re-Rooted and Transformed”
Richard D. Friedman
Cato Supreme Court Review
2004
“ ‘Face to Face’: Rediscovering the Right to Confront Prosecution Witnesses”
Richard D. Friedman
International Journal of Evidence and Proof
2004
“The Crawford Transformation”
Richard D. Friedman
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2004
“Face to Face with the Right of Confrontation”
Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
2004
“A Resident of Evidenceland Defends His Turf”
Richard D. Friedman
Quinnipiac Law Review
2003
“Crawford v. Washington”
Richard D. Friedman
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2003
“Sometimes What Everybody Thinks They Know Is True”
Richard D. Friedman
Law and Human Behavior
2003
“Minimizing the Jury Over-Valuation Concern”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan State Law Review
2003
“The Sometimes-Bumpy Stream of Commerce Clause Doctrine”
Richard D. Friedman
Arkansas Law Review
2003
“Squeezing Daubert Out of the Picture”
Richard D. Friedman
Seton Hall Law Review
2003
“Charting the Course of Commerce Clause Challenge”
Richard D. Friedman
Arkansas Law Review
2003
“Confrontation as a Hot Topic: The Virtues of Going Back to Square One”
Richard D. Friedman
Quinnipiac Law Review
2003
“Dial-in Testimony”
Richard D. Friedman
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
2002
“Remote Testimony”
Richard D. Friedman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2002
“Expert Testimony on Fingerprints: An Internet Exchange”
Richard D. Friedman
Jurimetrics
2002
“The Conundrum of Children, Confrontation, and Hearsay”
Richard D. Friedman
Law and Contemporary Problems
2002
“A Very Brief Primer on Bayesian Methods in Evidence”
Richard D. Friedman
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2002
“Trying to Make Peace with Bush v. Gore”
Richard D. Friedman
Florida State University Law Review
2001