Notre Dame L. Rev.
2021
“Scrutinizing Anticompetitive State Regulations Through Constitutional and Antitrust Lenses”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
William and Mary Law Review
2019
Virginia Law Review Online
2018
“Further Reflections On Antitrust And Wealth Inequality”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle
2017
“Is More Antitrust the Answer to Wealth Inequality?”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Regulation
2016
Cornell Law Review
2016
“Compensation for Antitrust Violations: An Economic Perspective”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Antitrust Bulletin
2016
“State Action Immunity and Section 5 of the FTC Act”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Michigan Law Review
2016
Antitrust Law Journal
2015
“All I Really Need to Know about Antitrust I Learned in 1912”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Iowa Law Review
2015
“Conditional Pricing and Monopolization: A Reflection on the State of Play”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Competition Law & Policy Debate
2015
“Patent Punting: How FDA and Antitrust Courts Undermine the Hatch-Waxman Act to Avoid Dealing with Patents”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review
2015
Notre Dame Law Review
2014
“The Tempting of Antitrust: Robert Bork and the Goals of Antitrust Policy”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Antitrust Law Journal
2014
Texas Law Review
2013
Columbia Business Law Review
2013
“Judicial Review of Anticompetitive State Action: Two Models in Comparative Perspective”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Oxford Journal of Antitrust Enforcement
2013
“ ‘The Magna Carta of Free Enterprise’ Really?”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Iowa Law Review Bulletin
2013
“A Neo-Chicago Perspective on Antitrust Institutions”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Antitrust Law Journal
2012
Competition Policy International
2012
“Search Neutrality as an Antitrust Principle”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
George Mason Law Review
2012
“Were Standard Oil’s Railroad Rebates and Drawbacks Cost Justified?”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Southern California Law Review
2012
“The Obama Justice Department’s Merger Enforcement Record: An Armchair Reply to Baker and Shapiro”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Stanford Law Review Online
2012
“Has the Obama Justice Department Reinvigorated Antitrust Enforcement?”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Stanford Law Review Online
2012
Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal
2011
Michigan Law Review
2011
“Toward a Unified Theory of Exclusionary Vertical Restraints”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Southern California Law Review
2011
Vanderbilt Law Review
2010
Antitrust Law Journal
2010
“Reflections on Section 5 of the FTC Act and the FTC’s Case Against Intel”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle
2010
“Did We Avoid Historical Failures of Antitrust Enforcement During the 2008-2009 Financial Crisis?”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Antitrust Law Journal
2010
Texas Law Review See Also
2009
“Bargaining in the Shadow of Rate-Setting Courts”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Antitrust Law Journal
2009
Cato Supreme Court Review
2009
“Can Bundled Discounting Increase Consumer Prices Without Excluding Rivals?”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Competition Policy International
2009
Regulation
2009
Texas Law Review
2009
“Substance, Procedure, and Institutions in the International Harmonization of Competition Policy”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Chicago Journal of International Law
2009
California Law Review
2008
Texas Law Review
2008
“Antitrust Enforcement During National Crises: An Unhappy History”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle
2008
Washington and Lee Law Review
2007
Emory Law Journal
2006
Antitrust Bulletin
2006
Cornell Law Review
2005
“Harmful Output in the Antitrust Domain: Lessons from the Tobacco Industry”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Georgia Law Review
2005
University of Chicago Law Review
2005
Regulation
2005
Minnesota Law Review
2004