“Logic and Elements”
Richard D. Friedman
Notre Dame Law Review
1998
“Truth and Its Rivals in the Law of Hearsay and Confrontation”
Richard D. Friedman
Hastings Law Journal
1998
“Focus on Faculty - Richard D. Friedman”
Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
1998
“Anchors and Flotsam: Is Evidence Law ‘Adrift’?”
Richard D. Friedman
Yale Law Journal
1998
“Confrontation: The Search for Basic Principles”
Richard D. Friedman
Georgetown Law Journal
1998
The Elements of Evidence
Richard D. Friedman1998
Cardozo Law Review
1997
“Chief Justice Hughes’ Letter on Court-packing”
Richard D. Friedman
Journal of Supreme Court History
1997
“Answering the Bayesioskeptical Challenge”
Richard D. Friedman
International Journal of Evidence and Proof
1997
“Towards a (Bayesian) Convergence?”
Richard D. Friedman
International Journal of Evidence and Proof
1997
Israel Law Review
1997
“Irrelevance, Minimal Relevance, and Meta-Relevance (Response to David Crump)”
Richard D. Friedman
Houston Law Review
1997
Confrontation Rights of Criminal Defendants
Richard D. Friedman1997
Review of The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees
Richard D. Friedman
American Journal of Legal History
1997
“Charles Evans Hughes as International Lawyer”
Richard D. Friedman- Legal Writing and Research
American Society of International Law (ASIL). Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting
1996
“General Editor’s Introduction to the Treatise: The New Wigmore in Perspective”
Richard D. Friedman
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence
1996
“General Editor’s Introduction to the Volume: Limitation on Admissibility and Rationales for Exclusion”
Richard D. Friedman
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility: Regulation of Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Policies and Values
1996
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility: Regulation of Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Policies and Values
Richard D. Friedman1996
“Telling the Story of the Hughes Court”
Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
1996
“Confrontation and the Utility of Rules”
Richard D. Friedman
Mississippi College Law Review
1995
“Probability and Proof in State v. Skipper: An Internet Exchange”
Richard D. Friedman
Jurimetrics Journal
1995
“Refining Conditional Probative Value”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review
1995
“Asymmetrical Peremptories Defended: A Reply”
Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Law Bulletin
1995
“Prior Statements of a Witness: A Nettlesome Corner of the Hearsay Thicket”
Richard D. Friedman
Supreme Court Review
1995
“Still Photographs in the Flow of Time”
Richard D. Friedman
Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities
1995
“Switching Time and Other Thought Experiments: The Hughes Court and Constitutional Transformation”
Richard D. Friedman
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
1994
“Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction between Personality and Situation”
Richard D. Friedman- Criminal Law
Duke Law Journal
1994
“A Response and Reply: Assymetrical Peremptories Defended”
Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
1994
“Conditional Probative Value: Neoclassicism without Myth”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review
1994
“A Reaffirmation: The Authenticity of the Roberts Memorandum, or Felix the Non-Forger”
Richard D. Friedman
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
1994
“The Death and Transfiguration of Frye”
Richard D. Friedman
Jurimetrics Journal
1994
“Toward a Partial Economic, Game-Theoretic Analysis of Hearsay”
Richard D. Friedman
Minnesota Law Review
1992
“Infinite Strands, Infinitesimally Thin: Storytelling, Bayesianism, Hearsay and Other Evidence”
Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1992
“Evidentiary Rules and Rulings: The Role of Treatises”
Richard D. Friedman
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
1992
“Standards of Persuasion and the Distinction between Fact and Law”
Richard D. Friedman
Northwestern University Law Review
1992
“An Asymmetrical Approach to the Problem of Peremptories?”
Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Law Bulletin
1992
“Improving the Procedure for Resolving Hearsay Issues”
Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1991
“Character Impeachment Evidence: Psycho-Bayesian (!?) Analysis and a Proposed Overhaul”
Richard D. Friedman
UCLA Law Review
1991
Review of Cardozo: A Study in Reputation
Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1991
“Putting the Dormancy Doctrine Out of Its Misery”
Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1991
The Elements of Evidence
Richard D. Friedman1991
“Stalking the Squeeze: Understanding Commodities Market Manipulation”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review
1990
“Some Modest Proposals on the Vice-Presidency”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review
1988
“Some Modest Proposals on the Vice-Presidency”
Richard D. Friedman
Daily Journal Report
1988
“Route Analysis of Credibility and Hearsay”
Richard D. Friedman
Yale Law Journal
1987
“Balance Favoring Restraint”
Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1987
“Tribal Myths: Ideology and the Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominations”
Richard D. Friedman
Yale Law Journal
1986
“Comment: Generalized Inferences, Individual Merits, and Jury Discretion”
Richard D. Friedman
Boston University Law Review
1986
“A Diagrammatic Approach to Evidence”
Richard D. Friedman
Boston University Law Review
1986
“Antitrust Analysis and Bilateral Monopoly”
Richard D. Friedman- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Wisconsin Law Review
1986