“Crawford, Davis, and Way Beyond”
Richard D. Friedman
Journal of Law and Policy
2007
“The Story of Crawford”
Richard D. Friedman
Evidence Stories
2006
“ ‘We Really (For the Most Part) Mean It!’ ”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
2006
“Crawford Surprises: Mostly Unpleasant”
Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Justice
2005
“Confrontation after Crawford”
Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
2005
“Grappling with the Meaning of ‘Testimonial’ ”
Richard D. Friedman
Brooklyn Law Review
2005
“The Crawford Transformation”
Richard D. Friedman
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2004
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Expert Evidence
Richard D. Friedman2004
The Elements of Evidence
Richard D. Friedman2004
“ ‘Face to Face’: Rediscovering the Right to Confront Prosecution Witnesses”
Richard D. Friedman
International Journal of Evidence and Proof
2004
“Face to Face with the Right of Confrontation”
Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
2004
“Adjusting to Crawford: High Court Decision Restores Confrontation Clause Protection”
Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Justice
2004
“The Confrontation Clause Re-Rooted and Transformed”
Richard D. Friedman
Cato Supreme Court Review
2004
“Squeezing Daubert Out of the Picture”
Richard D. Friedman
Seton Hall Law Review
2003
“A Resident of Evidenceland Defends His Turf”
Richard D. Friedman
Quinnipiac Law Review
2003
“Crawford v. Washington”
Richard D. Friedman
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2003
“Sometimes What Everybody Thinks They Know Is True”
Richard D. Friedman
Law and Human Behavior
2003
“The Sometimes-Bumpy Stream of Commerce Clause Doctrine”
Richard D. Friedman
Arkansas Law Review
2003
“Confrontation as a Hot Topic: The Virtues of Going Back to Square One”
Richard D. Friedman
Quinnipiac Law Review
2003
“Charting the Course of Commerce Clause Challenge”
Richard D. Friedman
Arkansas Law Review
2003
“Minimizing the Jury Over-Valuation Concern”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan State Law Review
2003
Review of The Constitution and the New Deal
Richard D. Friedman
Modern Law Review
2002
“...A Rendezvous with Kreplach: Putting the New Deal Court in Context”
Richard D. Friedman
Green Bag
2002
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility: Regulation of Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Policies and Values
Richard D. Friedman2002
“No Link: The Jury and the Origins of the Confrontation Right and the Hearsay Rule”
Richard D. Friedman
“The Dearest Birth Right of the People of England”: The Jury in the History of Common Law
2002
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Evidentiary Privileges
Richard D. Friedman2002
“The Conundrum of Children, Confrontation, and Hearsay”
Richard D. Friedman
Law and Contemporary Problems
2002
“Expert Testimony on Fingerprints: An Internet Exchange”
Richard D. Friedman
Jurimetrics
2002
“A Very Brief Primer on Bayesian Methods in Evidence”
Richard D. Friedman
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2002
“Remote Testimony”
Richard D. Friedman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2002
“Dial-in Testimony”
Richard D. Friedman
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
2002
International Society of Barristers Quarterly
2001
“ ‘E’ Is for Eclectic: Multiple Perspectives on Evidence”
Richard D. Friedman
Virginia Law Review
2001
Law Quadrangle Notes
2001
“ ‘Bush’ v. ‘Gore’: What Was the Supreme Court Thinking?”
Richard D. Friedman- Constitutional Law
Commonweal
2001
“Trying to Make Peace with Bush v. Gore”
Richard D. Friedman
Florida State University Law Review
2001
“The Suggestibility of Children: Scientific Research and Legal Implications”
Richard D. Friedman- Children and the Law
Cornell Law Review
2000
“DNA as Evidence: Viewing Science through the Prism of the Law”
Richard D. Friedman- Criminal Law
Law Quadrangle Notes
2000
“Lilly v. Virginia Glimmers of Hope for the Confrontation Clause?”
Richard D. Friedman
International Commentary on Evidence
2000
“Attempting to Ensure Fairness in the Glare of the Media”
Richard D. Friedman- Criminal Law
The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings
2000
“A Presumption of Innocence, Not of Even Odds”
Richard D. Friedman
Stanford Law Review
2000
Review of Leaving the Bench: Supreme Court Justices at the End
Richard D. Friedman
American Journal of Legal History
2000
“Cardozo the [Small r] realist”
Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review
2000
Journal of Supreme Court History
1999
“Lilly v. Virginia: A Chance to Reconceptualize the Confrontation Right”
Richard D. Friedman
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
1999
“DNA Database Searches and the Legal Consumption of Scientific Evidence”
Richard D. Friedman- Criminal Law
Michigan Law Review
1999
“Confrontation Confronted”
Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
1999
“Thoughts from Across the Water on Hearsay and Confrontation”
Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Law Review
1998
“Economic Analysis of Evidentiary Law: An Underused Tool, an Underplowed Field”
Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1998