“A Suggestion on Suggestion”

Richard D. Friedman
  • Children and the Law
Law Quadrangle Notes
2001

“The Suggestibility of Child Witnesses”

Richard D. Friedman
  • Children and the Law
International Society of Barristers Quarterly
2001

“ ‘E’ Is for Eclectic: Multiple Perspectives on Evidence”

Richard D. Friedman
Virginia Law Review
2001

“ ‘Bush’ v. ‘Gore’: What Was the Supreme Court Thinking?”

Richard D. Friedman
  • Constitutional Law
Commonweal
2001

“The Suggestibility of Children: Scientific Research and Legal Implications”

Richard D. Friedman
  • Children and the Law
Cornell Law Review
2000

“DNA as Evidence: Viewing Science through the Prism of the Law”

Richard D. Friedman
  • Criminal Law
Law Quadrangle Notes
2000

“Lilly v. Virginia Glimmers of Hope for the Confrontation Clause?”

Richard D. Friedman
International Commentary on Evidence
2000

“A Presumption of Innocence, Not of Even Odds”

Richard D. Friedman
Stanford Law Review
2000

“Confrontation Confronted”

Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
1999

“Lilly v. Virginia: A Chance to Reconceptualize the Confrontation Right”

Richard D. Friedman
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
1999

“DNA Database Searches and the Legal Consumption of Scientific Evidence”

Richard D. Friedman
  • Criminal Law
Michigan Law Review
1999

“Thoughts from Across the Water on Hearsay and Confrontation”

Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Law Review
1998

“Confrontation: The Search for Basic Principles”

Richard D. Friedman
Georgetown Law Journal
1998

“Economic Analysis of Evidentiary Law: An Underused Tool, an Underplowed Field”

Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1998

“Focus on Faculty - Richard D. Friedman”

Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
1998

“Logic and Elements”

Richard D. Friedman
Notre Dame Law Review
1998

“Truth and Its Rivals in the Law of Hearsay and Confrontation”

Richard D. Friedman
Hastings Law Journal
1998

“Chief Justice Hughes’ Letter on Court-packing”

Richard D. Friedman
Journal of Supreme Court History
1997

“Answering the Bayesioskeptical Challenge”

Richard D. Friedman
International Journal of Evidence and Proof
1997

“Confrontation and the Definition of Chutzpa”

Richard D. Friedman
  • Criminal Law
Israel Law Review
1997

“Irrelevance, Minimal Relevance, and Meta-Relevance (Response to David Crump)”

Richard D. Friedman
Houston Law Review
1997

“Dealing with Evidentiary Deficiency”

Richard D. Friedman
  • Litigation
Cardozo Law Review
1997

“Towards a (Bayesian) Convergence?”

Richard D. Friedman
International Journal of Evidence and Proof
1997

“Telling the Story of the Hughes Court”

Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
1996

“Asymmetrical Peremptories Defended: A Reply”

Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Law Bulletin
1995

“Probability and Proof in State v. Skipper: An Internet Exchange”

Richard D. Friedman
Jurimetrics Journal
1995

“Confrontation and the Utility of Rules”

Richard D. Friedman
Mississippi College Law Review
1995

“Refining Conditional Probative Value”

Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review
1995

“Prior Statements of a Witness: A Nettlesome Corner of the Hearsay Thicket”

Richard D. Friedman
Supreme Court Review
1995

“Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction between Personality and Situation”

Richard D. Friedman
  • Criminal Law
Duke Law Journal
1994

“Conditional Probative Value: Neoclassicism without Myth”

Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review
1994

“The Death and Transfiguration of Frye”

Richard D. Friedman
Jurimetrics Journal
1994

“Switching Time and Other Thought Experiments: The Hughes Court and Constitutional Transformation”

Richard D. Friedman
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
1994

“A Reaffirmation: The Authenticity of the Roberts Memorandum, or Felix the Non-Forger”

Richard D. Friedman
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
1994

“A Response and Reply: Assymetrical Peremptories Defended”

Richard D. Friedman
Law Quadrangle Notes
1994

“Standards of Persuasion and the Distinction between Fact and Law”

Richard D. Friedman
Northwestern University Law Review
1992

“Infinite Strands, Infinitesimally Thin: Storytelling, Bayesianism, Hearsay and Other Evidence”

Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1992

“Evidentiary Rules and Rulings: The Role of Treatises”

Richard D. Friedman
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
1992

“Toward a Partial Economic, Game-Theoretic Analysis of Hearsay”

Richard D. Friedman
Minnesota Law Review
1992

“An Asymmetrical Approach to the Problem of Peremptories?”

Richard D. Friedman
Criminal Law Bulletin
1992

“Character Impeachment Evidence: Psycho-Bayesian (!?) Analysis and a Proposed Overhaul”

Richard D. Friedman
UCLA Law Review
1991

“Improving the Procedure for Resolving Hearsay Issues”

Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1991

“Putting the Dormancy Doctrine Out of Its Misery”

Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1991

“Stalking the Squeeze: Understanding Commodities Market Manipulation”

Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review
1990

“Some Modest Proposals on the Vice-Presidency”

Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review
1988

“Some Modest Proposals on the Vice-Presidency”

Richard D. Friedman
Daily Journal Report
1988

“Route Analysis of Credibility and Hearsay”

Richard D. Friedman
Yale Law Journal
1987

“Balance Favoring Restraint”

Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
1987

“A Diagrammatic Approach to Evidence”

Richard D. Friedman
Boston University Law Review
1986

“Postscript: On Quantifying Probative Value”

Richard D. Friedman
Boston University Law Review
1986