Improv­ing Crim­i­nal Jury Deci­sion Mak­ing After the Blake­ly Revolution”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Uni­ver­si­ty of Illi­nois Law Review
2006

Don’t Wor­ry, I’ll Be Right Back: Tem­po­rary Absences of Coun­sel Dur­ing Crim­i­nal Tri­als and the Rule of Auto­mat­ic Reversal”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Nebras­ka Law Review
2006

Crim­i­nal Pro­ce­dure and the Con­sti­tu­tion: Lead­ing Supreme Court Cas­es and Intro­duc­to­ry Text

  • Crim­i­nal Law
  • Con­sti­tu­tion­al Law
2006

Crim­i­nal Pro­ce­dure — Con­sti­tu­tion­al Lim­i­ta­tions in a Nutshell

  • Crim­i­nal Law
  • Con­sti­tu­tion­al Law
2006

 Who Do You Think You Are?’ The Crim­i­nal Tri­al and Com­mu­ni­ty Character”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
The Tri­al on Trial
2006

Juris­dic­tion­al Com­pe­ti­tion in Crim­i­nal Jus­tice: How Much Does It Real­ly Happen?”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review
2006

Souter Pas­sant, Scalia Ram­pant: Com­bat in the Marsh”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review First Impressions
2006