The Con­fronta­tion Right”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
The Oxford Hand­book of Crim­i­nal Process
2019

The Child Quasi-Witness”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
  • Chil­dren and the Law
Psy­chol­o­gy, Pub­lic Pol­i­cy, and the Law
2015

Come Back to the Boat, Jus­tice Breyer!”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review First Impressions
2014

The Frame of Ref­er­ence and Oth­er Problems”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review First Impressions
2014

Who Said the Craw­ford Rev­o­lu­tion Would Be Easy?”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Crim­i­nal Justice
2012

Poten­tial Respons­es to the Melen­dez-Diaz Line of Cases”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
  • Con­sti­tu­tion­al Law
Crim­i­nal Law Reporter
2011

Who Must Tes­ti­fy to the Results of a Foren­sic Lab­o­ra­to­ry Test? Bull­com­ing v. New Mexico”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Pre­view of Unit­ed States Supreme Court Cases
2011

DNA as Evi­dence: View­ing Sci­ence through the Prism of the Law”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Law Quad­ran­gle Notes
2000

Attempt­ing to Ensure Fair­ness in the Glare of the Media”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
The Judi­cial Role in Crim­i­nal Proceedings
2000

DNA Data­base Search­es and the Legal Con­sump­tion of Sci­en­tif­ic Evidence”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Michi­gan Law Review
1999

Con­fronta­tion and the Def­i­n­i­tion of Chutzpa”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Israel Law Review
1997

Char­ac­ter Impeach­ment Evi­dence: The Asym­met­ri­cal Inter­ac­tion between Per­son­al­i­ty and Situation”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Duke Law Journal
1994

Crim­i­nal Jus­tice: Pol­i­cy Coordination”

  • Crim­i­nal Law
Mary­land Law Forum
1981