“The Radical Challenge to the Antitrust Order”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Wake Forest Law Review
2024

“Antitrust After the Coming Wave”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
NYU Law Review
2024

“Use of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Development”

Nicholson Price
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Health Law
JAMA Network
2024

“Calculating the Harms of Political Use of Popular Music”

Aaron Perzanowski
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
University of California Law Journal
2024

“The Sufficiency of Disclosure of Medical Artificial Intelligence Patents”

Nicholson Price
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Health Law
Nature Biotechnology
2024

“Methodological and Normative Elements of the New Antitrust”

Sanjukta Paul
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Journal of Antitrust Enforcement
2023

“Tattoos, Norms, and Implied Licenses”

Aaron Perzanowski
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Minnesota Law Review
2023

“How the Blockchain Undermined Digital Ownership”

Aaron Perzanowski
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Washington and Lee Law Review
2023

“Criminal Enforcement of Section 2 of the Sherman Act: An Empirical Assessment”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Antitrust Law Journal
2022

“Marijuana and Patents: The Complicated Relationship between Patent Rights and the Federal Criminalization of Marijuana”

Howard J. Bromberg
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
AIPLA Quarterly Journal
2022

“Antitrust as an Instrument of Democracy”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Duke Law Journal Online
2022

“Consumer Perceptions of the Right to Repair”

Aaron Perzanowski
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Indiana Law Journal
2021

“The Lost World of the Administrative Procedure Act: A Literature Review”

Christopher J. Walker
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Administrative Law
George Mason Law Review
2021

“The Indirect Purchaser Rule and Private Enforcement of Antitrust Law: A Reassessment”

Spencer D. Smith
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
2021

“Recovering the Moral Economy Foundations of the Sherman Act”

Sanjukta Paul
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Legal History
Yale Law Journal
2021

“An Administrative Fix for Manufacturing Process Patent Thickets”

Nicholson Price
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Health Law
Nature Biotechnology
2021

“Symposium: Diamond Anniversary: 75 Years of the Lanham Act”

Jessica Litman
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Legal History
Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Journal
2021

“Antitrust Antitextualism”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Notre Dame L. Rev.
2021

“Whether and How the U.S. Government Should Exercise Its Compulsory Licensing Authority Under 28 U.S.C. § 1498 and the Bayh-Dole Act”

Rebecca S. Eisenberg
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
New York University Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law
2021

“The Cost of Novelty”

Nicholson Price
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Law and Technology
Columbia Law Review
2020

“Abandoning Copyright”

Aaron Perzanowski
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
William and Mary Law Review
2020

“Fascism and Monopoly”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Michigan Law Review
2020

“Antitrust as Allocator of Coordination Rights”

Sanjukta Paul
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Corporate and Securities Law
UCLA Law Review
2020

“Discerning a Dignitary Offense: The Concept of Equal Public Rights during Reconstruction”

Rebecca J. Scott
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Race and the Law
Law and History Review
2020

“Scrutinizing Anticompetitive State Regulations Through Constitutional and Antitrust Lenses”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
William and Mary Law Review
2019

“The Tethered Economy”

Aaron Perzanowski
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
George Washington Law Review
2019

“Fissuring and the Firm Exemption”

Sanjukta Paul
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Labor and Employment Law
Law and Contemporary Problems
2019

“The Private Law Critique of International Investment Law”

Julian Arato
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • International and Comparative Law
American Journal of International Law
2019

“The New World of Agency Adjudication”

Christopher J. Walker
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Administrative Law
  • Legal History
California Law Review
2019

“Clown Eggs”

Aaron Perzanowski
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Notre Dame Law Review
2019

“Opting Into Device Regulation in the Face of Uncertain Patentability”

Rebecca S. Eisenberg
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Law and Technology
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
2019

“A Functional Approach to Judicial Review of PTAB Rulings on Mixed Questions of Law and Fact”

Rebecca S. Eisenberg
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Iowa Law Review
2019

“Antitrust’s Unconventional Politics”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Virginia Law Review Online
2018

“What We Don’t See When We See Copyright as Property”

Jessica Litman
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Cambridge Law Journal
2018

“The Limits of Copyright Office Expertise”

Aaron Perzanowski
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Berkeley Technology Law Journal
2018

“Universities: The Fallen Angels of Bayh-Dole?”

Rebecca S. Eisenberg
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Daedalus
2018

“Further Reflections On Antitrust And Wealth Inequality”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle
2017

“Uber as For-Profit Hiring Hall: A Price-Fixing Paradox and its Implications”

Sanjukta Paul
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Labor and Employment Law
Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law
2017

“Promoting Healthcare Innovation on the Demand Side”

Nicholson Price Rebecca S. Eisenberg
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Law and Technology
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
2017

“What Notice Did”

Jessica Litman
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Boston University Law Review
2016

“Antitrust and Wealth Inequality”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Cornell Law Review
2016

“The Pendulum Swings: Reconsidering Corporate Criminal Prosecution”

  • Criminal Law
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Administrative Law
U.C. Davis Law Review
2016

“Chevron Deference and Patent Exceptionalism”

Christopher J. Walker
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Administrative Law
Duke Law Journal Online
2016

“Compensation for Antitrust Violations: An Economic Perspective”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Antitrust Bulletin
2016

“The Enduring Ambiguities of Antitrust Liability for Worker Collective Action”

Sanjukta Paul
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
  • Labor and Employment Law
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
2016

“State Action Immunity and Section 5 of the FTC Act”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Michigan Law Review
2016

“Is More Antitrust the Answer to Wealth Inequality?”

Daniel A. Crane
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Regulation
2016

“Patent Notice and the Trouble with Plain Meaning”

Margaret Jane Radin
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Boston University Law Review
2016

“The Interactions of Exhaustiondthe General Law: A Reply to Duffy and Hynes”

Aaron Perzanowski
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Virginia Law Review Online
2016

“Campbell at 21/Sony at 31”

Jessica Litman
  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Washington Law Review
2015