“Engendering Change”
California Lawyer
1998
“Sheep, Joking, Cloning and the Uncanny”
- Law and Technology
Clones and Clones: Facts and Fantasies about Human Cloning
1998
“Domestic Violence: Standards of Perfection and Battered Women’s Self-Defense”
- Criminal Law
Violence against Women: Philosophical Perspectives
1998
“Focus on Faculty - Catharine A. MacKinnon”
Law Quadrangle Notes
1998
“The Impact on Freedom of Speech”
- Civil Rights
The Impact of the Human Rights Bill on English Law
1998
“Rape, Genocide, and Women’s Human Rights”
- Human Rights
Violence against Women: Philosophical Perspectives
1998
The Elements of Evidence
1998
“Truth and Its Rivals in the Law of Hearsay and Confrontation”
Hastings Law Journal
1998
Law Quadrangle Notes
1998
“Memo to Congress: It’s Time to Repeal the U.S. Portfolio Interest Exemption”
- Tax Law
Tax Notes International
1998
Canadian Journal of Criminology
1998
“Thoughts from Across the Water on Hearsay and Confrontation”
Criminal Law Review
1998
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
1998
“Mandatory Arbitration of Employee Discrimination Claims: Unmitigated Evil or Blessing in Disguise?”
Thomas M Cooley Law Review
1998
“How the Wagner Act Came to Be: A Prospectus”
Michigan Law Review
1998
The Common Law of the Workplace: The Views of Arbitrators
1998
“State Judges, State Officers, and Federal Commands After Seminole Tribe and Printz”
- Constitutional Law
Wisconsin Law Review
1998
Visual Cognition
1998
“Notes from the Editorial Advisory Board (Tenth Anniversary Symposium: New Directions in Law and the Humanities)”
Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities
1998
“The Slippery Slope to Bankruptcy - Should Some Claimants Get a ‘Carve-Out’ from Secured Credit? No: It’s a Populist Craving for a Petit Bourgeois Valhalla”
Business Law Today
1998
“The Reluctant Justice: Lewis F. Powell Jr. Personifies the ‘Quality of Attentiveness’ ”
American Bar Association Journal
1998
“Response to Judging Religion by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan (Symposium: Religion and the Judicial Process: Legal, Ethical, and Empirical Dimensions)”
Marquette Law Review
1998
Property
1998
“Risk Assessment”
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law
1998
“Some Implications of Cognitive Psychology for Risk Regulation”
Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law
1998
Arizona Law Review
1998
Wisconsin Law Review
1998
English Historical Review
1998
Criminal Procedure and the Constitution: Leading Criminal Procedure Cases and Introductory Text
- Criminal Law
- Constitutional Law
1998
“Update: American Public Opinion on the Death Penalty - It’s Getting Personal”
- Criminal Law
Cornell Law Review
1998
“Make-Believe: The Rules Excluding Evidence of Character and Liability Insurance”
- Criminal Law
Hastings Law Journal
1998
Law and Contemporary Problems
1998
“We Could Pass a Law...What Might Happen if Contingent Legal Fees Were Banned”
- Criminal Law
DePaul Law Review
1998
“Law in the Backwaters: A Comment of Mirjan Damaška’s Evidence Law Adrift”
- Criminal Law
Hastings Law Journal
1998
“Legal Education”
Michigan Bar Journal
1998
“Same-Sex Harassment”
Michigan Bar Journal
1998
“Have Smoking Gun, Will Travel”
Michigan Bar Journal
1998
The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work-Product Doctrine in Michigan
1998
“Confrontation: The Search for Basic Principles”
Georgetown Law Journal
1998
“Economic Analysis of Evidentiary Law: An Underused Tool, an Underplowed Field”
Cardozo Law Review
1998
“Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons on Biomedical Research”
- Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Science
1998
“Anchors and Flotsam: Is Evidence Law ‘Adrift’?”
Yale Law Journal
1998
Law Quadrangle Notes
1998
The Oxford Companion to Classical Civilization
1998
“Focus on Faculty - Richard D. Friedman”
Law Quadrangle Notes
1998
“Beyond RFRA: Free Exercise of Religion Comes of Age in the State Courts”
St Thomas Law Review
1998
“Logic and Elements”
Notre Dame Law Review
1998
Trends in Genetics
1998
“A Populist Critique of Direct Democracy”
Harvard Law Review
1998
“The Original Understanding of the ‘Effects Clause’ of Article IV, Section 1 and Implications for the Defense of Marriage Act”
George Mason Law Review
1998