“The Concept of International Organization”

  • International and Comparative Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
Cambridge Companion to International Organizations Law
2022

Free Speech: From Core Values to Current Debates

  • Constitutional Law
2022

To Participate and Elect: Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act at 40

  • Constitutional Law
  • Litigation
2022

“Textualism, Judicial Supremacy, and the Independent State Legislature Theory”

  • Constitutional Law
Wisconsin Law Review
2022

“Suspect Spheres, Not Enumerated Powers: A Guide for Leaving the Lamppost”

  • Constitutional Law
Michigan Law Review
2021

“Reframing Article I, Section 8”

  • Constitutional Law
Fordham Law Review
2021

Constitutional Law: An Integrated Approach

  • Constitutional Law
2021

Criminal Procedure and the Constitution

  • Criminal Law
  • Constitutional Law
2021

“The Federalist Constitution: Foreword”

  • Constitutional Law
Fordham Law Review
2021

Constitutional Law: Cases and Materials

  • Constitutional Law
2021

“A plea for proportionality: A reply to Yun-chien Chang and Xin Dai”

  • International and Comparative Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
International Journal of Constitutional Law
2021

“Constitutional Theories of International Organisations: Beyond the West”

  • International and Comparative Law
  • Constitutional Law
Chinese Journal of International Law
2021

“Transportation, Land Use, and the Sources of Hyper-Localism”

  • Constitutional Law
Iowa Law Review
2021

“The Law of Energy Exports”

  • Constitutional Law
  • Environmental and Energy Law
California Law Review
2021

“Segregation in the Galleries: A Reconsideration”

  • Constitutional Law
Michigan Law Review Online
2020

“Federal Forum Provisions and the Internal Affairs Doctrine”

  • Constitutional Law
Harvard Business Law Review
2020

“The American Law of Overruling Necessity: The Exceptional Origins of State Police Power”

  • Constitutional Law
States of Exception in American History
2020

“Disaggregating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Doctrine: Four Forms of Constitutional Ineffectiveness”

  • Constitutional Law
Stanford Law Review
2020

“The Executive Power Clause”

  • Constitutional Law
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
2020

“Herein of ‘Herein Granted’: Why Article I’s Vesting Clause Does Not Support the Doctrine of Enumerated Powers”

  • Constitutional Law
Constitutional Commentary
2020

“Lin-Manuel Miranda and the Future of Originalism”

  • Constitutional Law
Hamilton and the Law: Reading Today’s Most Contentious Legal Issues through the Hit Musical
2020

“How Europe Brought Judicial Review to France: A Response to Bruce Ackerman”

  • Constitutional Law
Revolutionary Constitutionalism: Law, Legitimacy, Power
2020

“Marshaling McCulloch”

  • Constitutional Law
  • Legal History
Arkansas Law Review
2020

“Politics, Indian Law, and The Constitution”

  • Constitutional Law
California Law Review
2020

“Politics and the Histories of International Law: An Introduction to the Special Issue”

  • International and Comparative Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
Journal of the History of International Law
2020

“Law and the Political Economy of Hunger”

  • International and Comparative Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
European Journal of International Law
2020

“Service Provision and the Study of Local Legislatures: A Response to Professor Zale”

  • Constitutional Law
  • Administrative Law
Ohio State Law Journal Online
2020

“Eminent Domain Law as Climate Policy”

  • Constitutional Law
  • Environmental and Energy Law
Wisconsin Law Review
2020

“The Public Use Clause in an Age of U.S. Natural Gas Exports”

  • Constitutional Law
Stanford Law Review Online
2020

“Article II Vests Executive Power, Not the Royal Prerogative”

  • Constitutional Law
Columbia Law Review
2019

“The Most Revealing Word in the United States Reports”

  • Constitutional Law
Green Bag
2019

Criminal Procedure and the Constitution: Leading Supreme Court Cases and Introductory Text

  • Criminal Law
  • Constitutional Law
2019

“Location Tracking and Digital Data: Can Carpenter Build a Stable Privacy Doctrine?”

  • Criminal Law
  • Constitutional Law
Supreme Court Review
2019

“The Elephant Problem”

  • Constitutional Law
Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy
2019

“The Progressive Idea of Democratic Administration”

  • Constitutional Law
  • Legal History
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
2019

Of Bee Stings, Mud Pies, and Outhouses: Exploring the Value of Satire Through the Theory of Useful Untruths.

  • Constitutional Law
2019

“New Textualism and the Thirteenth Amendment”

  • Constitutional Law
  • Civil Rights
Cornell Law Review Online
2019

“Equality of Opportunity and the Schoolhouse Gate”

  • Constitutional Law
  • Legal Writing and Research
  • Civil Rights
Yale Law Journal
2019

“The Constitutional Law of Incarceration, Reconfigured”

  • Constitutional Law
Cornell Law Review
2018

“Executive Power and National Security Power”

  • Constitutional Law
The Cambridge Companion to the United States Constitution
2018

Criminal Procedure and the Constitution: Leading Supreme Court Cases and Introductory Text

  • Criminal Law
  • Constitutional Law
2018

Gender in Constitutional Law

  • Constitutional Law
2018

“The Republic in Long-Term Perspective”

  • Constitutional Law
Michigan Law Review Online
2018

“Second Redemption, Third Reconstruction”

  • Constitutional Law
California Law Review
2018

“Research Review: Gender in Constitutions”

  • Constitutional Law
Gender in Constitutional Law
2018

“In Tribute: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy”

  • Constitutional Law
Harvard Law Review
2018

“How Not to Do Things with International Law”

  • International and Comparative Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
Ethics & International Affairs
2018

“American Unicameralism: The Structure of Local Legislatures”

  • Constitutional Law
Hastings Law Journal
2018

“The Gibbons Fallacy”

  • Constitutional Law
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law
2017

“The Constitutional Constant”

  • Constitutional Law
Cornell Law Review
2017