“A Resident of Evidenceland Defends His Turf”

Quinnipiac Law Review
2003

“Crawford v. Washington”

American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2003

“Remote Testimony”

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2002

“Expert Testimony on Fingerprints: An Internet Exchange”

Jurimetrics
2002

“No Link: The Jury and the Origins of the Confrontation Right and the Hearsay Rule”

“The Dearest Birth Right of the People of England”: The Jury in the History of Common Law
2002

“The Conundrum of Children, Confrontation, and Hearsay”

Law and Contemporary Problems
2002

“...A Rendezvous with Kreplach: Putting the New Deal Court in Context”

Green Bag
2002

Review of The Constitution and the New Deal

Modern Law Review
2002

The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Evidentiary Privileges

2002

“A Very Brief Primer on Bayesian Methods in Evidence”

American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2002

The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility: Regulation of Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Policies and Values

2002

“Dial-in Testimony”

University of Pennsylvania Law Review
2002

“Trying to Make Peace with Bush v. Gore”

Florida State University Law Review
2001

“A Suggestion on Suggestion”

  • Children and the Law
Law Quadrangle Notes
2001

“The Suggestibility of Child Witnesses”

  • Children and the Law
International Society of Barristers Quarterly
2001

“ ‘E’ Is for Eclectic: Multiple Perspectives on Evidence”

Virginia Law Review
2001

“ ‘Bush’ v. ‘Gore’: What Was the Supreme Court Thinking?”

  • Constitutional Law
Commonweal
2001

Review of Leaving the Bench: Supreme Court Justices at the End

American Journal of Legal History
2000

“The Suggestibility of Children: Scientific Research and Legal Implications”

  • Children and the Law
Cornell Law Review
2000

“DNA as Evidence: Viewing Science through the Prism of the Law”

  • Criminal Law
Law Quadrangle Notes
2000

“Lilly v. Virginia Glimmers of Hope for the Confrontation Clause?”

International Commentary on Evidence
2000

“Cardozo the [Small r] realist”

Michigan Law Review
2000

“A Presumption of Innocence, Not of Even Odds”

Stanford Law Review
2000

“Attempting to Ensure Fairness in the Glare of the Media”

  • Criminal Law
The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings
2000

“Confrontation Confronted”

Law Quadrangle Notes
1999

“Lilly v. Virginia: A Chance to Reconceptualize the Confrontation Right”

American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
1999

“DNA Database Searches and the Legal Consumption of Scientific Evidence”

  • Criminal Law
Michigan Law Review
1999

“Taking Decisions Seriously”

  • Constitutional Law
Journal of Supreme Court History
1999

“Confrontation: The Search for Basic Principles”

Georgetown Law Journal
1998

“Economic Analysis of Evidentiary Law: An Underused Tool, an Underplowed Field”

Cardozo Law Review
1998

“Anchors and Flotsam: Is Evidence Law ‘Adrift’?”

Yale Law Journal
1998

“Focus on Faculty - Richard D. Friedman”

Law Quadrangle Notes
1998

“Logic and Elements”

Notre Dame Law Review
1998

The Elements of Evidence

1998

“Truth and Its Rivals in the Law of Hearsay and Confrontation”

Hastings Law Journal
1998

“Thoughts from Across the Water on Hearsay and Confrontation”

Criminal Law Review
1998

Review of The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees

American Journal of Legal History
1997

“Chief Justice Hughes’ Letter on Court-packing”

Journal of Supreme Court History
1997

“Answering the Bayesioskeptical Challenge”

International Journal of Evidence and Proof
1997

“Confrontation and the Definition of Chutzpa”

  • Criminal Law
Israel Law Review
1997

“Irrelevance, Minimal Relevance, and Meta-Relevance (Response to David Crump)”

Houston Law Review
1997

“Dealing with Evidentiary Deficiency”

  • Litigation
Cardozo Law Review
1997

“Towards a (Bayesian) Convergence?”

International Journal of Evidence and Proof
1997

“Telling the Story of the Hughes Court”

Law Quadrangle Notes
1996

“General Editor’s Introduction to the Volume: Limitation on Admissibility and Rationales for Exclusion”

The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility: Regulation of Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Policies and Values
1996

“General Editor’s Introduction to the Treatise: The New Wigmore in Perspective”

The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence
1996

The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility: Regulation of Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Policies and Values

1996

“Still Photographs in the Flow of Time”

Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities
1995

“Probability and Proof in State v. Skipper: An Internet Exchange”

Jurimetrics Journal
1995

“Confrontation and the Utility of Rules”

Mississippi College Law Review
1995