Of Bee Stings, Mud Pies, and Outhouses: Exploring the Value of Satire Through the Theory of Useful Untruths.

  • Constitutional Law
2019

“There is No Work-Life Balance”

  • Legal Writing and Research
Litigation Journal
2019

“Policing Hate Speech and Extremism: A Taxonomy of Arguments in Opposition”

  • Civil Rights
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2019

“Catch and Kill: Does the First Amendment Protect Buying Speech To Bury It?”

  • Civil Rights
Communications Lawyer
2019

“Strengthening Medical-Legal Partnerships: The Advocacy Letter Project”

  • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Academic Pediatrics
2019

“Opposing Family Separation Policies for the Welfare of Children”

  • Children and the Law
American Journal of Public Health
2019

“What we talk about when we talk about trafficking: A reflection on the first 20 years of the modern anti-slavery fight”

  • Human Rights
  • Civil Rights
  • Legal History
Routledge International Handbook of Human Trafficking: A Multi-Disciplinary and Applied Approach
2019

“Prosecutors and Voters Are Becoming Smart on Crime”

  • Criminal Law
Litigation
2019

“Failed Protectors: The Indian Trust and Killers of the Flower Moon”

Michigan Law Review
2019

“The Restatement of the Law of American Indians: The Process and Why It Matters”

Montana Law Review
2019

“Indian Children and the Fifth Amendment”

Montana Law Review
2019

“The Indian Child Welfare Act as the “Gold Standard””

APSAC Advisor
2019

“Interview with Khaled Beydoun”

  • Public Interest Law
  • Health Law
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2019

Review of Beyond the Borders of the Law: Critical Legal Histories of the North American West edited by Katrina Jagodinsky and Pablo Mitchell

  • Legal History
Journal of Arizona History
2019

“Constitutionalization”

Concepts for International Law: Contributions for Disciplinary Thought
2019

“Why Not Compare?”

The Dream Revisited: Contemporary Debates About Housing, Segregation, and Opportunity
2019

“Democracy in Peril: A Call for Amici and Amicae Curiae and Critical Lawyering”

  • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Transnational Legal Theory
2019

Review of Law and Society in Later Medieval England and Ireland: Essays in Honour of Paul Brand, ed. Travis R. Baker

The English Historical Review
2019

“Reading Terminology in the Sources for the Early Common Law: Seisin, Simple and Not So Simple”

English Legal History and its Sources: Essays in Honor of Sir John Baker
2019

“Bozkurt Case, aka the Lotus Case (France v Turkey): Ships that Go Bump in the Night”

Feminist Judgments in International Law
2019

“New Textualism and the Thirteenth Amendment”

  • Constitutional Law
  • Civil Rights
Cornell Law Review Online
2019

Commentary on Security Council Resolution 2467: Continued State Obligation and Civil Society Action on Sexual Violence in Conflict

2019

“State Nuisance Law and the Climate Change Challenge to Federalism”

NYU Environmental Law Journal
2019

Poisonous Skies: Acid Rain and the Globalization of Pollution

  • Environmental and Energy Law
2019

“Should Automakers Be Responsible for Accidents?”

Regulation
2019

“Global Investment Rules as a Site for Moral Inquiry”

  • International and Comparative Law
Journal of Political Philosophy
2019

“Uselessly Accurate”

  • Legal Writing and Research
Scribes Journal of Legal Writing
2019

“Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs: Universalism and Reproductive Justice”

  • Civil Rights
Reproductive Rights and Justice Stories
2019

“Feigned Consensus: Usurping the Law in Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma Prosecutions”

  • Children and the Law
Wisconsin Law Review
2019

“Corresponding Ideas in Corresponding Forms”

  • Legal Writing and Research
Michigan Bar Journal
2019

“Does Duress Justify or Excuse? The Significance of Larry Alexander’s Ambivalence”

Moral Puzzles and Legal Perplexities: Essays on the Influence of Larry Alexander
2019

“Preface to the Third Edition by the General Editor”

  • Litigation
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence: Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility
2019

“Identifying the Impact of Labor Market Opportunities on Criminal Behavior”

  • Criminal Law
International Review of Law and Economics
2019

U.S. International Taxation, Cases and Materials

  • Tax Law
2019

“Religious Slaughter and Animal Welfare Revisited: CJEU, Liga van Moskeeen en Islamitische Organisaties Provincie Antwerpen (2018)”

  • Human Rights
Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law
2019

Cases and Materials on Marijuana Law

  • Criminal Law
2019

Review of Draft No. 4 by John McPhee

  • Legal Writing and Research
Scribes Journal of Legal Writing
2019

“Imaginary Bottles”

  • Law and Technology
Duke Law & Technology Review
2019

“Class Actions, Indivisibility, and Rule 23(b)(2)”

  • Public Interest Law
Boston University Law Review
2019

“The Rise and Decline of the International Rule of Law and the Job of Scholars”

  • International and Comparative Law
The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline?
2019

Advanced Criminal Procedure: Cases, Comments and Questions

  • Criminal Law
2019

“International Law and Political Philosophy: Uncovering New Linkages”

  • International and Comparative Law
Philosophy Compass
2019

“Just Say No to the Cheap Double Play”

Florida International University Law Review
2019

“Neglecting Nationalism”

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law
2019

Criminal Procedure Constitutional Limitations in a Nutshell

  • Criminal Law
2019

“Legal Uncertainty and Indeterminacy: Immutable Characteristics of the OSCE?”

  • International and Comparative Law
The Legal Framework of the OSCE
2019

“Fiduciary Principles in Bankruptcy and Insolvency”

The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law
2019

“Privacy in the Era of Medical Big Data”

  • Law and Technology
  • Health Law
Nature Medicine
2019

“Reputation and Accountability: Another Look at the United Nations’ Response to the Cholera Epidemic in Haiti”

  • International and Comparative Law
International Organizations Law Review
2019

“Article II Vests Executive Power, Not the Royal Prerogative”

  • Constitutional Law
Columbia Law Review
2019