“Lawyers as Social Engineers: How Lawyers Should Use Their Social Capital to Achieve Economic Justice”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
2021

“Spoiler Alert: When the Supreme Court Ruins Your Brief Problem Mid-Semester”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Perspectives: Teaching Legal Research and Writing
2020

“Consumer Psychology and the Problem of Fine Print Fraud”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Stanford Law Review
2020

“Incorporating Social Science into Criminal Defense Practice”

  • Criminal Law
  • Law and Social Sciences
Champion
2020

“The Problem with Assumptions: Revisiting “The Dark Figure of Sexual Recidivism””

  • Law and Social Sciences
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
2020

“Olmstead v. L.C.: The Supreme Court Case”

  • Human Rights
  • Public Interest Law
  • Law and Social Sciences
Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy
2020

“Domestic Violence Convictions and Firearms Possession: The Law as It Stands and as It Moves”

  • Criminal Law
  • Law and Social Sciences
Michigan Bar Journal
2019

“When Law Calls, Does Science Answer? A Survey of Distinguished Scientists & Engineers”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018

“Issue on Science & the Legal System”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018

“Why Hillary Won’t Be Indicted and Shouldn’t Be: An Objective Legal Analysis”

  • Law and Social Sciences
The American Prospect Longform
2016

“Justice Kennedy and the Fisher Revisit: Will the Irrelevant Prove Decisive?”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Texas Law Review See Also
2016

“Basic Emotions and the Rocks of New Hampshire”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Emotion Review
2014

“Growing Up in Law & Society: The Pulls of Policy and Methods”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
2013

“Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Emotion Review
2013

“Legal Reasoning and Scientific Reasoning”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Alabama Law Review
2011

“Proud Americans and Lucky Japanese: Cultural Differences in Appraisal and Corresponding Emotion”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Emotion
2011

“Maintaining U.S. Scientific Leadership”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Science Progress
2008

“Shifting Sands: The Jurisprudence of Integration Past, Present, and Future”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Howard Law Journal
2004

“Amicus Brief: Kumho Tire v. Carmichael”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Law and Human Behavior
2000

“A Classic at 25: Reflections of Galanter’s ‘Haves’ Article and Work It Has Inspired”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Law and Society Review
1999

“The Trouble with Hairdressers”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Representations
1996

“The Abuses of Social Science: A Response to Fineman and Opie”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Wisconsin Law Review
1987

“Social Policy Experimentation: A Position Paper”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Evaluation Studies: Review Annual
1986

“Social Science in Court: On ‘Eyewitness Experts’ and Other Issues”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Law and Human Behavior
1986

“The Twelve-Person, Unanimous Jury: Does It Have More than History to Recommend It?”

  • Law and Social Sciences
International Society of Barristers Quarterly
1986

“Law & Society: Its Research”

  • Law and Social Sciences
SyllaBus. (American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar)
1984

“A Right to Every Woman’s Evidence”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Iowa Law Review
1981