“Introduction”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018

“When Law Calls, Does Science Answer? A Survey of Distinguished Scientists & Engineers”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018

“Issue on Science & the Legal System”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018

“Why Hillary Won’t Be Indicted and Shouldn’t Be: An Objective Legal Analysis”

  • Law and Social Sciences
The American Prospect Longform
2016

“Justice Kennedy and the Fisher Revisit: Will the Irrelevant Prove Decisive?”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Texas Law Review See Also
2016

“The Mismatch Myth in U.S. Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Empirical Evidence at the Law School and Undergraduate Levels”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Affirmative Action and Racial Equity: Considering the Fisher Case to Forge the Path Ahead
2015

Review of Failing Law Schools by Brian Tamanaha

  • Law and Social Sciences
Contemporary Sociology
2014

“Basic Emotions and the Rocks of New Hampshire”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Emotion Review
2014

“Growing Up in Law & Society: The Pulls of Policy and Methods”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
2013

“Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Emotion Review
2013

“Maggots and Morals: Physical Disgust is to Fear as Moral Disgust is to Anger”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook
2013

Great Lives from History: The Incredibly Wealthy

  • Law and Social Sciences
2011

“Legal Reasoning and Scientific Reasoning”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Alabama Law Review
2011

“Proud Americans and Lucky Japanese: Cultural Differences in Appraisal and Corresponding Emotion”

  • Law and Social Sciences
Emotion
2011

“The Rise and Fall of the High-Impact Experiment”

  • Law and Social Sciences
The Scientist and the Humanist: A Festschrift in Honor of Elliot Aronson
2010