“The Supreme Court is poised to reverse affirmative action: Here’s what you need to know”
Brookings
2023
Daedalus
2018
“When Law Calls, Does Science Answer? A Survey of Distinguished Scientists & Engineers”
- Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018
Daedalus
2018
“Justice Kennedy and the Fisher Revisit: Will the Irrelevant Prove Decisive?”
- Law and Social Sciences
Texas Law Review See Also
2016
“Why Hillary Won’t Be Indicted and Shouldn’t Be: An Objective Legal Analysis”
- Law and Social Sciences
The American Prospect Longform
2016
“Mismatch and Science Desistance: Failed Arguments Against Affirmative Action”
UCLA Law Review Discourse
2016
“The Mismatch Myth in U.S. Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Empirical Evidence at the Law School and Undergraduate Levels”
- Law and Social Sciences
Affirmative Action and Racial Equity: Considering the Fisher Case to Forge the Path Ahead
2015
“The American Jury System: A Synthetic Overview”
Chicago-Kent Law Review
2015
Contemporary Sociology
2014
“Growing Up in Law & Society: The Pulls of Policy and Methods”
- Law and Social Sciences
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
2013
A Modern Approach to Evidence
2013
A Modern Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, Transcripts, and Cases
2011
“Reflections on Class in American Legal Education”
Denver University Law Review
2011
“The Inevitability of Theory”
California Law Review
2010
“Can there be a Progressive Bioethics?”
Progress in Bioethics
2010
“A Personal Odyssey Toward a Theme: Race and Equality in the United States: 1948-2009”
Law and Society Review
2010
“The Significance of Statistical Significance: Two Authors Restate an Incontrovertible Caution. Why a Book?”
Law and Social Inquiry
2009
“Low Probability / High Consequence Events: Dilemmas of Damage Compensation”
DePaul Law Review
2009
Science Progress
2008
“Empirical Research for Public Policy: With Examples from Family Law”
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
2008
“Anglo-American and Continental Systems: Marsupials and Mammals of the Law”
- Law and Social Sciences
Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context: Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjan Damaska
2008
“Frank Allen: An Appreciation”
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2008
“Policy Forum: Studying Eyewitness Investigations in the Field”
Law and Human Behavior
2008
“The Internationalization of Lay Legal Decision-Making: Jury Resurgence and Jury Research”
Cornell International Law Journal
2007
“Group Report: What is the Role of Heuristics in Litigation”
- Law and Social Sciences
Heuristics and the Law
2006
“Citizen Participation in Jury Decision Making: Juries, Lay Judges and Japan”
The Jury System: Contemporary Research
2006
Introduction to Evidence Stories
Evidence Stories
2006
Evidence Stories
2006
“The Real Impact of Eliminating Affirmative Action in American Law Schools: An Empirical Critique of Richard Sander’s Study”
- Public Interest Law
Stanford Law Review
2005
“The Organization of American Legal Education: Are There Any Lessons for Japan?”
Journal of Law and Politics
2004
“Amerika Gassyukoku ni okeru Hogaku Kyoiku Taisei: Nihon ni totte Kyokun ha Sonzai suruka”
Ho to Seiji
2004
“Breaking Deadlock, Shattering Ideals”
Law, Probability and Risk
2002
“Value Issues - The Public Health Response to Bioterrorism”
Findings Magazine
2002
“Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, and a Supreme Court Inspired Agenda for Jury Research (Special Issue: The Jury’s Role in Administering Justice in the United States)”
St Louis University Public Law Review
2002
“Following the Man on the Clapham Omnibus: Social Science Evidence in Malpractice Litigation”
Wake Forest Law Review
2002
“Which Students? Japan’s Challenge and Opportunity”
Law Quadrangle Notes
2002
“Business on Trial: The True Story”
Judicature
2002
“Activist Scholarship”
Law and Society Review
2001
“Myths and Facts about Affirmative Action”
Arizona Attorney
2001
“Juries: Investments in Democracy”
Law Quadrangle Notes
2001
“The Economic Analysis of Evidence Law: Common Sense on Stilts”
Virginia Law Review
2001
“Michigan’s Minority Graduates in Practice: Answers to Methodological Queries”
Law and Social Inquiry
2000
A Modern Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, Transcripts, and Cases
2000
“Linking the Visions”
Law Quadrangle Notes
2000
“Michigan’s Minority Graduates in Practice: The River Runs through Law School”
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Law and Social Inquiry
2000
“Befuddled Judges: Statistical Evidence in Title VII Cases”
Legacies of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
2000
Law and Human Behavior
2000
“Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, and a Supreme Court Inspired Agenda for Jury Research”
International Commentary on Evidence
1999
“Organizing for Deterrence: Lessons from a Study of Child Support”
Family Law in Action: A Reader
1999