“Lawyers as Social Engineers: How Lawyers Should Use Their Social Capital to Achieve Economic Justice”
- Law and Social Sciences
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
2021
“Spoiler Alert: When the Supreme Court Ruins Your Brief Problem Mid-Semester”
- Law and Social Sciences
Perspectives: Teaching Legal Research and Writing
2020
“Consumer Psychology and the Problem of Fine Print Fraud”
- Law and Social Sciences
Stanford Law Review
2020
“Incorporating Social Science into Criminal Defense Practice”
- Criminal Law
- Law and Social Sciences
Champion
2020
“The Problem with Assumptions: Revisiting “The Dark Figure of Sexual Recidivism””
- Law and Social Sciences
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
2020
“Olmstead v. L.C.: The Supreme Court Case”
- Human Rights
- Public Interest Law
- Law and Social Sciences
Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy
2020
“Domestic Violence Convictions and Firearms Possession: The Law as It Stands and as It Moves”
- Criminal Law
- Law and Social Sciences
Michigan Bar Journal
2019
“When Law Calls, Does Science Answer? A Survey of Distinguished Scientists & Engineers”
- Law and Social Sciences
Daedalus
2018
Daedalus
2018
“Why Hillary Won’t Be Indicted and Shouldn’t Be: An Objective Legal Analysis”
- Law and Social Sciences
The American Prospect Longform
2016
“Justice Kennedy and the Fisher Revisit: Will the Irrelevant Prove Decisive?”
- Law and Social Sciences
Texas Law Review See Also
2016
Emotion Review
2014
“Growing Up in Law & Society: The Pulls of Policy and Methods”
- Law and Social Sciences
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
2013
“Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development”
- Law and Social Sciences
Emotion Review
2013
Alabama Law Review
2011
“Proud Americans and Lucky Japanese: Cultural Differences in Appraisal and Corresponding Emotion”
- Law and Social Sciences
Emotion
2011
Science Progress
2008
Representations
1996