“Foreign-Invested Companies Limited by Shares and Private Purchases of Equity”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Buying a Business in the PRC
1998

“Investment/Holding Companies in China--Chinese and U.S. Tax Issues: Part 1”

  • International and Comparative Law
Journal of International Taxation
1998

“Holding Companies in China: U.S. and P.R.C. Tax Considerations”

  • International and Comparative Law
East Asian Executive Reports
1998

Review of Political Theory for Mortals: Shades of Justice, Images of Death

Journal of Politics
1998

“Enlightenment”

  • Legal History
Law Quadrangle Notes
1998

Poisoning the Minds of the Lower Orders

  • Legal History
  • Philosophy of Law
1998

“Liberalism Stumbles in Tennessee”

  • Legal History
Michigan Law Review
1998

“Legal Education”

Michigan Bar Journal
1998

“Same-Sex Harassment”

Michigan Bar Journal
1998

“Have Smoking Gun, Will Travel”

Michigan Bar Journal
1998

The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work-Product Doctrine in Michigan

1998

“Confrontation: The Search for Basic Principles”

Georgetown Law Journal
1998

“Economic Analysis of Evidentiary Law: An Underused Tool, an Underplowed Field”

Cardozo Law Review
1998

“Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons on Biomedical Research”

  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Science
1998

“Anchors and Flotsam: Is Evidence Law ‘Adrift’?”

Yale Law Journal
1998

“Upstream Patents = Downstream Bottlenecks”

  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Law Quadrangle Notes
1998

“Status, Legal and Social (Roman)”

  • Legal History
The Oxford Companion to Classical Civilization
1998

“Focus on Faculty - Richard D. Friedman”

Law Quadrangle Notes
1998

“Beyond RFRA: Free Exercise of Religion Comes of Age in the State Courts”

St Thomas Law Review
1998

“Logic and Elements”

Notre Dame Law Review
1998

“Do EST Patents Matter?”

  • Intellectual Property and Antitrust
Trends in Genetics
1998

“A Populist Critique of Direct Democracy”

Harvard Law Review
1998

“The Original Understanding of the ‘Effects Clause’ of Article IV, Section 1 and Implications for the Defense of Marriage Act”

George Mason Law Review
1998