“Just Say No? Shareholder Voting on Securities Class Actions”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
University of Chicago Business Law Review
2022

“The Future of Securities Law in the Supreme Court”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Columbia Business Law Review
2021

“Working Hard or Making Work? Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Fees in Securities Fraud Class Actions”

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
2020

“Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Gender Gap for Securities and Exchange Commission Attorneys”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Law and Economics
2019

“Texas Gulf Sulphur and the Genesis of Corporate Liability Under Rule 10b-5”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Southern Methodist University Law Review
2018

“Securities Law in the Sixties: The Supreme Court, the Second Circuit, and the Triumph of Purpose Over Text”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Notre Dame Law Review
2018

“Piling On? An Empirical Study of Parallel Derivative Suits”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
2017

“Do Delaware CEOs Get Fired?”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Banking and Finance
2017

“Carrot or Stick? The Shift from Voluntary to Mandatory Disclosure of Risk Factors”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
2016

“The SEC, Administrative Usurpation, and Insider Trading”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Stanford Law Review Online
2016

“SEC Investigations and Securities Class Actions: An Empirical Comparison”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
2016

“Halliburton II: A Loser’s History”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy
2015

“Dirks and the Genesis of Personal Benefit”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Southern Methodist University Law Review
2015

“The Influence of Arbitrator Background and Representation on Arbitration Outcomes”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Virginia Law & Business Review
2014

“From Basic to Halliburton”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Regulation
2014

“Frequent Filers: The Problems of Shareholder Lawsuits and the Path to Reform”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
2014

“Revisiting ‘Truth in Securities’ Revisited: Abolishing IPOs and Harnessing Private Markets in the Public Good”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Seattle University Law Review
2013

“Scandal Enforcement at the SEC: The Arc of the Option Backdating Investigations”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
American Law and Economics Review
2013

“Frequent Filers: Repeat Plaintiffs in Shareholder Litigation”

  • Administrative Law
U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
2013

“Facebook, the JOBS Act, and Abolishing IPOs”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Regulation
2012

“The Supreme Court’s Impact on Securities Class Actions: An Empirical Assessment of Tellabs”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Law, Economics and Organization
2011

“Securities Law in the Roberts Court: Agenda or Indifference?”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Corporation Law
2011

“Populist Retribution and International Competition in Financial Services Regulation”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Creighton Law Review
2010

“Attorneys as Arbitrators”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Legal Studies
2010

“The Screening Effect of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
2009

“London as Delaware?”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
University of Cincinnati Law Review
2009

“Securities Law and the New Deal Justices”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Virginia Law Review
2009

“The Role of Independent Directors in Corporate Groups”

Journal of Korean Law
2009

“London as Delaware?”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Regulation
2009

“Monitoring of Corporate Groups by Independent Directors”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Korean Law
2009

“‘Basic’ error is focus on loss”

National Law Journal
2008

“Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta: The Political Economy of Securities Class Action Reform”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Cato Supreme Court Review
2008

“Do the Merits Matter More? The Impact of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
  • Litigation
Journal of Law, Economics and Organization
2007

“The Irrational Auditor and Irrational Liability”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Lewis and Clark Law Review
2006

“The SEC at 70: Time for Retirement?”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Law Quadrangle Notes
2005

“Do Institutions Matter? The Impact of the Lead Plaintiff Provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Washington University Law Quarterly
2005

“The SEC at 70: Time for Retirement?”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Notre Dame Law Review
2005

“What Counts as Fraud? An Empirical Study of Motions to Dismiss Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
2005

“Behavioral Economics and the SEC”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Corporate Practice Commentator
2005

“Should Issuers be on the Hook for Laddering? An Empirical Analysis of the IPO Market Manipulation Litigation”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
University of Cincinnati Law Review
2004

“Tender Offers by Controlling Shareholders: The Specter of Coercion and Fair Price”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Berkeley Business Law Journal
2004

“Behavioral Economics and the SEC”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Stanford Law Review
2003

“Too Busy to MInd. the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board Appointments”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
The Journal of Finance
2003

“Should Congress Repeal Securities Class Action Reform?”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Cato Policy Analysis
2003

“Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. and the Counterrevolution in the Federal Securities Laws”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Duke Law Journal
2003

“Self-Regulation and Securities Markets”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Regulation
2003

“Who Cares?”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Washington University Law Quarterly
2002

“Statutes with Multiple Personality Disorders: The Value of Ambiguity in Statutory Design and Interpretation”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Stanford Law Review
2002

“Markets as Monitors: A Proposal to Replace Class Actions with Exchanges as Securities Fraud Enforcers”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Securities Law Review
2001

“In re Silicon Graphics Inc.: Shareholder Wealth Effects Resulting from the Interpretation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’s Pleading Standard”

  • Corporate and Securities Law
Corporate Practice Commentator
2001