“Grappling with the Meaning of ‘Testimonial’ ”
Brooklyn Law Review
2005
“Confrontation after Crawford”
Law Quadrangle Notes
2005
“Crawford Surprises: Mostly Unpleasant”
Criminal Justice
2005
“Adjusting to Crawford: High Court Decision Restores Confrontation Clause Protection”
Criminal Justice
2004
The Elements of Evidence
2004
“The Confrontation Clause Re-Rooted and Transformed”
Cato Supreme Court Review
2004
“ ‘Face to Face’: Rediscovering the Right to Confront Prosecution Witnesses”
International Journal of Evidence and Proof
2004
“The Crawford Transformation”
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2004
“Face to Face with the Right of Confrontation”
Law Quadrangle Notes
2004
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Expert Evidence
2004
“Sometimes What Everybody Thinks They Know Is True”
Law and Human Behavior
2003
“The Triangle of Culture, Inference, and Litigation System”
Law, Probability and Risk
2003
“Minimizing the Jury Over-Valuation Concern”
Michigan State Law Review
2003
“The Sometimes-Bumpy Stream of Commerce Clause Doctrine”
Arkansas Law Review
2003
“Squeezing Daubert Out of the Picture”
Seton Hall Law Review
2003
“Charting the Course of Commerce Clause Challenge”
Arkansas Law Review
2003
“Confrontation as a Hot Topic: The Virtues of Going Back to Square One”
Quinnipiac Law Review
2003
“A Resident of Evidenceland Defends His Turf”
Quinnipiac Law Review
2003
“Crawford v. Washington”
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2003
“Remote Testimony”
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
2002
“Expert Testimony on Fingerprints: An Internet Exchange”
Jurimetrics
2002
“No Link: The Jury and the Origins of the Confrontation Right and the Hearsay Rule”
“The Dearest Birth Right of the People of England”: The Jury in the History of Common Law
2002
“The Conundrum of Children, Confrontation, and Hearsay”
Law and Contemporary Problems
2002
“...A Rendezvous with Kreplach: Putting the New Deal Court in Context”
Green Bag
2002
Review of The Constitution and the New Deal
Modern Law Review
2002
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Evidentiary Privileges
2002
“A Very Brief Primer on Bayesian Methods in Evidence”
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
2002
The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence. Selected Rules of Limited Admissibility: Regulation of Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Policies and Values
2002
“Dial-in Testimony”
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
2002
“Trying to Make Peace with Bush v. Gore”
Florida State University Law Review
2001
Law Quadrangle Notes
2001
International Society of Barristers Quarterly
2001
“ ‘E’ Is for Eclectic: Multiple Perspectives on Evidence”
Virginia Law Review
2001
Commonweal
2001
Review of Leaving the Bench: Supreme Court Justices at the End
American Journal of Legal History
2000
“The Suggestibility of Children: Scientific Research and Legal Implications”
- Children and the Law
Cornell Law Review
2000
Law Quadrangle Notes
2000
“Lilly v. Virginia Glimmers of Hope for the Confrontation Clause?”
International Commentary on Evidence
2000
“Cardozo the [Small r] realist”
Michigan Law Review
2000
“A Presumption of Innocence, Not of Even Odds”
Stanford Law Review
2000
The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings
2000
“Confrontation Confronted”
Law Quadrangle Notes
1999
“Lilly v. Virginia: A Chance to Reconceptualize the Confrontation Right”
American Association of Law Schools Section on Evidence Newsletter
1999
“DNA Database Searches and the Legal Consumption of Scientific Evidence”
- Criminal Law
Michigan Law Review
1999
Journal of Supreme Court History
1999
“Confrontation: The Search for Basic Principles”
Georgetown Law Journal
1998
“Economic Analysis of Evidentiary Law: An Underused Tool, an Underplowed Field”
Cardozo Law Review
1998
“Anchors and Flotsam: Is Evidence Law ‘Adrift’?”
Yale Law Journal
1998
“Focus on Faculty - Richard D. Friedman”
Law Quadrangle Notes
1998
“Logic and Elements”
Notre Dame Law Review
1998